Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36076189›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Preoperative serum CA19-9 should be routinely measured in the colorectal patients with preoperative normal serum CEA: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Zhenhui Li, Haibin Zhu, Xiaolin Pang, Yun Mao, Xiaoping Yi, Chunxia Li, Ming Lei, Xianshuo Cheng, Lei Liang, Jiamei Wu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ultrasensitive photoelectrochemical immunosensor based on floral cluster SnSFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Collagen Family as Promising Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenhui Li *Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Haibin Zhu *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
Xiaolin Pang *Department of Radiotherapy, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Yun Mao *Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Xiaoping Yi *Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Chunxia Li *Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
Ming LeiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, 650118, China.
Xianshuo ChengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, 650118, China.
Lei LiangDepartment of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, China.
Jiamei WuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Yingying DingDepartment of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, 650118, China.
Jun YangDepartment of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, China. yangjun6@kmmu.edu.cn.
Yingshi SunKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China. sys27@163.com.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China. taozhang@sdu.edu.cn.
Dingyun YouSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China. youdingyun@qq.com.
Zaiyi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China. zyliu@163.com.
Kunming Medical University · CNPeking University · CNShandong University · CNChongqing Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhether preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is an independent prognostic factor and there are interactions of serum CA19-9 with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on the risk of recurrence in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are still not clarified.

methodsConsecutive patients with CRC who underwent curative resection for stage II-III colorectal adenocarcinoma at five hospitals were collected. Based on Cox models, associations of preoperative CA19-9 with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in patients with or without elevated CEA, and interactions between CEA and CA19-9 were also calculated. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves were used to evaluate the associations between preoperative CA19-9 and CRC outcomes on a continuous scale.

resultsA total of 5048 patients (3029 [60.0%] men; median [interquartile range, IQR] age, 61.0 [51.0, 68.0] years; median [IQR] follow-up duration 46.8 [36.5-62.4] months) were included. The risk of recurrence increased with the elevated level of preoperative CA19-9, with the slope steeper in patients with normal CEA than those with elevated CEA. Worse RFS was observed for elevated preoperative CA19-9 (> 37 U/mL) (n = 738) versus normal preoperative CA19-9 (≤ 37 U/mL) (n = 4310) (3-year RFS rate: 59.4% versus 78.0%; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.79 to 2.28), and significant interaction was found between CA19-9 and CEA (P for interaction = 0.001). Increased risk and interaction with CEA were also observed for OS. In the Cox multivariable analysis, elevated CA19-9 was associated with shorter RFS and OS regardless of preoperative CEA level, even after adjustment for other prognostic factors (HR: 2.08, 95% CI:1.75 to 2.47; HR: 2.25, 95% CI:1.80 to 2.81). Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses yielded largely similar results. These associations were maintained in patients with stage II disease (n = 2724).

conclusionsPreoperative CA19-9 is an independent prognostic factor in CRC patients. Preoperative CA19-9 can be clinically used as a routine biomarker for CRC patients, especially with preoperative normal serum CEA.

Indexed as

CA-19-9 AntigenColorectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCA19-9CEAColorectal cancerInteraction

Identifiers

PMID36076189
PMCPMC9454113
OpenAlexW4295084520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.