Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36076151›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2023

Accuracy of emergency physician bedside ultrasonography compared with private teleradiologist for acute appendicitis diagnosis.

Ertuğrul Altuğ, Kemal Şener, Adem Çakir, Zeynep Betül Erdem, Gökhan Eyüpoğlu, Ramazan Güven

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ertuğrul AltuğDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. ertugrulaltug42@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-643X
Kemal ŞenerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-6663
Adem ÇakirDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ministry of Health of Turkey Canakkale Mehmet Akif Ersoy State Hospital, Canakkale, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4966-4882
Zeynep Betül ErdemDepartment of Medical Pathology, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0840-4689
Gökhan EyüpoğluDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-3690
Ramazan GüvenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4129-8985
Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality · TRMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause of abdominal pain resulting in admission to the emergency room. Imaging methods such as ultrasonography and CT are usually used for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Reports regarding CT scans conducted during night shifts are prepared by private teleradiologists.

aimsThe aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound performed by an emergency medicine specialist and private teleradiologists in the diagnosis of AA.

methodsThis study was conducted prospectively and in a single center in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Patients who were admitted to the study between 15.09.2020 and 15.09.2021 and were diagnosed with AA who met the study criteria were included. A total of 134 patients diagnosed with AA, who met the inclusion criteria, out of 158 operated patients were included in the study.

resultsIn the study, 77 were male and 57 were female. The mean age of patients with histopathologically positive AA was 31 and 31.5 in negative patients. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS performed by the emergency physician and private teleradiology for the diagnosis of AA were 78.4% and 59.3% and 58.8% and 53.1%, respectively.

conclusionsPOCUS performed by an emergency medicine specialist showed a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of AA compared with private teleradiology. Hence, POCUS is more successful in diagnosing AA than private teleradiology. In conclusion, we recommend the concurrent use of AS and POCUS in emergency departments rather than private teleradiology for the diagnosis of AA.

Indexed as

AppendicitisPhysiciansAcute DiseaseEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMalePoint-of-Care SystemsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyAcute appendicitisPoint-of-care ultrasoundRanson scoreTeleradiologist

Identifiers

PMID36076151
OpenAlexW4295083800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.