Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36076131›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2023

Evaluation of histogram equalization and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization effect on image quality and fractal dimensions of digital periapical radiographs.

Mojdeh Mehdizadeh, Kioumars Tavakoli Tafti, Parisa Soltani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Construction of multi-scale feature fusion segmentation model of MRI knee images based on dual attention mechanism weighted aggregation.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mojdeh MehdizadehDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Implants Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Kioumars Tavakoli TaftiDental Students' Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. kioumarstavakoli@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5290-7320
Parisa SoltaniDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Implants Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the effects of histogram equalization (HE) and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) on periapical images and fractal dimensions in the periapical region.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, digital periapical images were selected from the archive of Dentistry School of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The radiographs were taken from mandibular and maxillary anterior single root teeth with healthy root and periodontium. After applying HE and CLAHE algorithms to images, two radiologists evaluated the quality of apex detection from using a 5-point Likert scale (from 5 for very good image quality to 1 for very bad image quality). Afterward, all the images were imported to the ImageJ application, and the region of interest (ROI) was specified as the region between the two central incisors. The fractal box-counting method was used to determine fractal dimensions (FD) values. Nonparametric Wilcoxon-Friedman test, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient test, T-test, and Pair T-test were performed as statistical analysis (α = 0.05).

resultsFifty-three radiographs were analyzed and the image quality assessments were significantly different between raw images and images after performing HE, CLAHE (p value < 0.001), and using CLAHE algorithm significantly increases image quality assessments more than HE (p value = 0.009). There was a significant difference in FD values for images after applying CLAHE and HE compared to raw images (p value < 0.001), and HE decreased the FD value significantly more than CLAHE (p value = 0.019).

conclusionsEmploying CLAHE and HE algorithm via OpenCV python library improves the periapical image quality, which is more significant using the CLAHE algorithm. Moreover, applying CLAHE and HE reduces trabecular bone structure detection and FD values in periapical images, especially in HE.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFractalsCross-Sectional StudiesMandibleRadiographyContrast limited adaptive histogram equalizationDental digital radiographyFractal analysisHistogram equalizationPeriapical tissue

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.