SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2023
Microwave ablation for hepatic malignancies: a systematic review of the technology and differences in devices.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- MR-guided microwave ablation of liver tumors: outcomes in local tumor control and determinants of treatment success.European radiology · 2026Article
- High-power microwave ablation with preablation transarterial chemoembolization enhances ablation zone stability in patients with liver malignancies.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Biomaterial-based strategies for postoperative residual tumors: From margin clearance to immune control and tissue repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- A dual-transformable MgGa-MOF nanoplatform for HCC therapy via lactate metabolism blockade and immune reactivation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Synergistic immunomodulation: integrating physical ablation with immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic colorectal carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A 27-Year-Old Man with Chronic Traumatic Pancreatic Fistula Managed with Percutaneous Microwave Ablation.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Radiologic and Pathologic Insights in Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: A Report of Three Cases.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic and therapeutic understanding of multiple foci hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage and iodine-125 seed migration due to hepatogastric fistula: a case report and literature review.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Oncologic Outcomes after Percutaneous Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- TACE sequential MWA guided by cone-beam computed tomography in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma under the hepatic dome.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Uncooled TATO microwave system for liver ablation.Hepatic oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrowave ablation (MWA) has become the standard thermal-based treatment for hepatic malignancies in patients who have unresectable disease based on the biology of the tumor, the patients' comorbidities, and certain disease sites. The technical effectiveness, ablation success, local recurrence rates of hepatic malignancies treated with the various commercial microwave ablation devices has not been previously published in the peer reviewed literature. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the clinical outcomes for the various MWA devices in the use of a hepatic malignancies to best educate hepatic surgeons as well as interventional radiologists.
methodsA comprehensive review of the literature and instructions for use of each device that was published from 1/2013 to 12/2020 was performed. The main outcomes extracted were technical success, ablation success, major complications, local and new recurrence rates, recurrence-free survival, ablation volumes, time, and the number of antennas required. A qualitative review of the literature was performed.
resultsIn total, 29 studies reporting data on 3250 patients and 4500 tumors were included in this review. Median patient age was 60.5 years (range 3-91). 76.3% (2420 M/753 F) of patients were male. Hepatocellular carcinoma (55%) was the most common tumor pathology followed by colorectal liver metastasis (10%) and cholangiocarcinoma (4%). A majority of studies reported technical success (range, 91.6-100%) and ablation success (range, 73.1-100%), as well as major complications (range, 0-9.1%). Local recurrence (range, 0-50%) was reported by 21 of the studies; however, new recurrence (range, 12.2-64%) was reported less frequently (6 studies) and were further specified in 12, six, and four studies as intrahepatic distant recurrence (11.3-54.2%), extrahepatic distant recurrence (3.6-20%), and metastasis (1.1-36%). A total of three, six, and five studies report disease, progression, and recurrence-free survival rates, respectively.
conclusionMicrowave ablation is frequently used for the treatment of hepatic malignancies. A thorough understanding of the clinical outcomes associated with different pathologies and MWA devices can improve surgeon awareness and help prepare for operative planning and patient management. More consistent reporting of key outcomes in the literature is needed to achieve such an understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.