Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36075905›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Impact of basic network motifs on the collective response to perturbations.

Xiaoge Bao, Qitong Hu, Peng Ji, Wei Lin, Jürgen Kurths, Jan Nagler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A complex network perspective on brain disease.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoge Bao *Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8387-0559
Qitong Hu *Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Peng JiInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. pengji@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3225-8431
Wei LinKey Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1863-4306
Jürgen KurthsResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5926-4276
Jan NaglerDeep Dynamics, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt, Germany. jan.nagler@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9889-541X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many collective phenomena such as epidemic spreading and cascading failures in socioeconomic systems on networks are caused by perturbations of the dynamics. How perturbations propagate through networks, impact and disrupt their functions may depend on the network, the type and location of the perturbation as well as the spreading dynamics. Previous work has analyzed the retardation effects of the nodes along the propagation paths, suggesting a few transient propagation "scaling" regimes as a function of the nodes' degree, but regardless of motifs such as triangles. Yet, empirical networks consist of motifs enabling the proper functioning of the system. Here, we show that basic motifs along the propagation path jointly determine the previously proposed scaling regimes of distance-limited propagation and degree-limited propagation, or even cease their existence. Our results suggest a radical departure from these scaling regimes and provide a deeper understanding of the interplay of self-dynamics, interaction dynamics, and topological properties.

Indexed as

Epidemics

Identifiers

PMID36075905
PMCPMC9458749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.