Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36075258›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2023

#TurntTrending: a systematic review of substance use portrayals on social media platforms.

Brienna N Rutherford, Carmen C W Lim, Benjamin Johnson, Brandon Cheng, Jack Chung, Sandy Huang, Tianze Sun, Janni Leung, Daniel Stjepanović, Gary C K Chan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multi-level Risk and Protective Factors for Vaping Onset and Escalation Among Youth: a Focus on LGBTQ + Disparities.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Narrative Review of Nicotine and Alcohol Addiction Recovery Content on TikTok.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brienna N RutherfordNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6034-6527
Carmen C W LimNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1595-6307
Benjamin JohnsonNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2831-0150
Brandon ChengNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
Jack ChungNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3142-3316
Sandy HuangSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
Tianze SunNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3939-9499
Janni LeungNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5816-2959
Daniel StjepanovićNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4307-423X
Gary C K ChanNational Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7569-1948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThere is a growing body of literature exploring the types of substance-related content and their portrayals on various social media platforms. We aimed to summarize how content related to substances is portrayed on various social media platforms.

methodsThis systematic review was pre-registered on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42021291853). A comprehensive search was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Web of Science in April 2021. Original qualitative studies published post-2004 that included thematic and sentiment analyses of social media content on tobacco, alcohol, psychostimulant, e-cigarette, cannabis, opiate, stimulant/amphetamine, inhalant and novel psychoactive substance were included. Social media platforms were defined as online web- or application-based platforms that allowed users to generate content and interact via 'liking', comment or messaging features. Only studies that included summative and/or thematic content analyses of substance-related social media content were included.

resultsA total of 73 studies, which covered 15 905 182 substance-related posts on Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, TikTok and Weibo, were identified. A total of 76.3% of all substance-related content was positive in its depiction of substance use, with 20.2% of content depicting use negatively. Sentiment regarding opiate use however was commonly negative (55.5%). Most studies identified themes relating to Health, Safety and Harms (65.0%) of substance use. Themes relating to Promotions/Advertisements (63.3%), Informative content (55.0%) and Use behaviours (43.3%) were also frequently identified.

conclusionsSubstance-related content that promotes engagement with substance use or actively depicts use appears to be widely available on social media. The large public presence of this content may have concerning influences on attitudes, behaviours and risk perceptions relating to substance use, particularly among the most vulnerable and heaviest users of social media-adolescents and young adults.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSocial MediaSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentEmotionsHumansTobacco ProductsYoung Adultalcoholcannabise-cigarettesopiatespolysubstancesocial mediasubstance usetobacco

Identifiers

PMID36075258
PMCPMC10087142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.