Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36075209›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2023

Beyond Chronological Age: A Multidimensional Approach to Survival Prediction in Older Adults.

Jérôme Salignon, Debora Rizzuto, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Alberto Zucchelli, Laura Fratiglioni, Christian G Riedel, Davide L Vetrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Histone modification clocks for robust cross-species biological age prediction and elucidating senescence regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Quantifying Healthy Aging in Older Veterans Using Computational Audio Analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jérôme SalignonDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7242-3817
Debora RizzutoAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6199-9629
Amaia Calderón-LarrañagaAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alberto ZucchelliAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Laura FratiglioniAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian G RiedelDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Davide L VetranoAging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3099-4830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing interest in generating precise predictions of survival to improve the assessment of health and life-improving interventions. We aimed to (a) test if observable characteristics may provide a survival prediction independent of chronological age; (b) identify the most relevant predictors of survival; and (c) build a metric of multidimensional age.

methodsData from 3 095 individuals aged ≥60 from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen. Eighty-three variables covering 5 domains (diseases, risk factors, sociodemographics, functional status, and blood tests) were tested in penalized Cox regressions to predict 18-year mortality.

resultsThe best prediction of mortality at different follow-ups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves [AUROCs] 0.878-0.909) was obtained when 15 variables from all 5 domains were tested simultaneously in a penalized Cox regression. Significant prediction improvements were observed when chronological age was included as a covariate for 15- but not for 5- and 10-year survival. When comparing individual domains, we find that a combination of functional characteristics (ie, gait speed, cognition) gave the most accurate prediction, with estimates similar to chronological age for 5- (AUROC 0.836) and 10-year (AUROC 0.830) survival. Finally, we built a multidimensional measure of age by regressing the predicted mortality risk on chronological age, which displayed a stronger correlation with time to death (R = -0.760) than chronological age (R = -0.660) and predicted mortality better than widely used geriatric indices.

conclusionsCombining easily accessible characteristics can help in building highly accurate survival models and multidimensional age metrics with potentially broad geriatric and biomedical applications.

Indexed as

AgingGeriatric AssessmentAgedHumansRisk FactorsSwedenBiological ageChronological ageMultidimensional assessmentPersonalized medicineSurvival

Identifiers

PMID36075209
PMCPMC9879753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.