Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074987›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2022

Testing Deprivation and Threat: A Preregistered Network Analysis of the Dimensions of Early Adversity.

Sofia Carozza, Joni Holmes, Duncan E Astle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The effect of the "exposome" on developmental brain health and cognitive outcomes.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Research Review: Assessment of early-life adversity and trauma - cumulative risk and dimensional approaches.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Whole-brain white matter variation across childhood environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sofia CarozzaMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge.ORCID 0000-0002-0540-2071
Joni HolmesMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge.
Duncan E AstleMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge.ORCID 0000-0002-7042-5392

Funding

Medical Research Council G101400Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC-A060-5PQ40Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/2Wellcome Trust 076467/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust 08426812/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust 217065/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite abundant evidence of the detrimental effects of childhood adversity, its nature and underlying mechanisms remain contested. One influential theory, the

Indexed as

EmotionsPsychopathologyAdolescentChildCognitionHumansLongitudinal StudiesParentsAvon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)child developmentdeprivationearly adversitynetwork analysisopen materialspreregisteredthreat

Identifiers

PMID36074987
PMCPMC13020948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.