Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074779›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Quasi-experimental quantitative study of training programme for nurses and midwives regarding provision of neonatal resuscitation in selected governmental hospital, (Sudan), 2018.

Namarig Nasraldin Gidam, Widad Ibrahim Abdelgair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Namarig Nasraldin GidamMinistry of Health, Arrass General Hospital, Alrass, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2166-3925
Widad Ibrahim AbdelgairNursing Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, (ALTAIF) University, Altaif City, Saudi Arabia.
Altai State Medical University · RUMinistry of Health · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo measure the effectiveness of educational programmes for nurses regarding knowledge and practice of advanced resuscitation for newborn infants.

designThis is a quasi-experimental study in (Sudan, White Nile state), to evaluate the effectiveness of designed guidelines regarding advanced neonatal resuscitation for midwives during the period November 2020-January 2021.

methodsData were collected using two tools: semi-structured questionnaire and checklist. The number of the respondents to the questionnaire is 75 nurses. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 22). Data were expressed as percentages. The results show that the level of knowledge is improved significantly after training programme interventions, with safe practice reaching (98.70%) compared with a pre-test percentage of (11.5%). This indicates a steep rise in safe practice after the simulation section, a sharp decrease in unsafe practice after the practical section, followed by subsequent decrease in neonatal mortality rate. This paper has been guided by (STROBE, cohort study) checklist.

resultsThe study concluded that the majority of nurses and midwives have some knowledge regarding advanced neonatal resuscitation but still, there is a practice gap because of a shortage of facilities and lack of training, However, training programmes do add value on knowledge and practice for nurses and eventually decrease neonatal mortality rate.

Indexed as

MidwiferyNursesCohort StudiesFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyResuscitationSudanadvanceneonatal resuscitationnurses and midwivestraining programme

Identifiers

PMID36074779
PMCPMC9834532
OpenAlexW4294991251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.