ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
Liquid biopsy in lung cancer management.
Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical value of blood circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) in liquid biopsy of lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Roles of Tumor-Educated Platelets (TEPs) in the biology of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review. "Re-discovering the neglected biosources of the liquid biopsy family".The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024Review
- Epigenetic regulation of pulmonary inflammation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid biopsy is a promising tool for a better cancer management and currently opens perspectives for several clinical applications, such as detection of mutations when the analysis from tissue is not available, monitoring tumor mutational burden and prediction of targeted therapy response. These characteristics validate liquid biopsy analysis as a strong cancer biomarkers source with high potential for improving cancer patient's evolution. Compared to classical biopsy, liquid biopsy is a minimal invasive procedure, and it allows the real-time monitoring of treatment response. Considering that lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-associated death worldwide and that only 15-19% of the lung cancer patients survive five years after diagnosis, there is an important interest in improving its management. Like in other types of solid cancers, lung cancer could benefit from liquid biopsy through a simple peripheral blood sample as tumor-related biomarkers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free nucleic acids (cfNA) [cell-free ribonucleic acid (cfRNA) and cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA)], exosomes and tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) may shed into circulation because of necrosis or in an active manner. More, the detection and analysis of these biomarkers could lead to a better understanding of oncological diseases like lung cancer. The better the tumor profile is established; the better management is possible. However, this approach has currently some limitations, such as low cfNA concentration or low count of CTCs that might be overcome by improving the actual methods and technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.