ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2023
Rhesus monkeys with damage to amygdala or orbitofrontal cortex perform well on novelty-based memory tasks.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novelty, Ecological Relevance, and Sexual Receptivity Modulate Neuronal Interactions between the Amygdala and Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Microbiota-host metabolism reprogramming in colorectal cancer: from pathogenesis to precision therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) are interconnected regions that serve as key nodes in brain circuits supporting social and affective behaviors. An important question that has come into focus is whether these regions also play a fundamental role in responding to novelty. One possibility is that these regions are important for discriminating novel from familiar stimuli. An alternative possibility is that these regions contribute to affective responses to stimuli in novelty-based tasks. For example, the amygdala and OFC could contribute to assessing novel stimuli as being threatening or previously selected stimuli as having reward value. The present study tested rhesus macaque monkeys with damage to the amygdala or OFC, along with sham-operated control monkeys, across six variants of novelty-based memory tasks. The results showed that monkeys with damage to the amygdala or OFC performed better overall than control monkeys across the tasks. The results indicated that neither region was essential for discriminating novel from familiar stimuli. Instead, the findings suggested that the improved performance observed in novelty-based tasks following damage to these regions was more likely attributable to influences on affect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.