Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074550›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Testing and Optimizing Guided Thinking Tasks to Promote Physical Activity: Protocol for a Randomized Factorial Trial.

Austin S Baldwin, Colin L Lamb, Bree A Geary, Alexis D Mitchell, Chrystyna D Kouros, Sara Levens, Laura E Martin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05235360 (Factorial Trial to Test Unique and Combined Effects of Guided Thinking Tasks to Optimize a Physical Activity Intervention Among Underactive Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05235360 nacompletednot on this map

Factorial Trial to Test Unique and Combined Effects of Guided Thinking Tasks to Optimize a Physical Activity Intervention Among Underactive Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorSouthern Methodist UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled184ConditionsPhysical InactivityArmsEpisodic future thinking, Positive affect imagery, Action planning, High dose, Recent thinking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Power Calculation in 2Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Austin S BaldwinDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8602-6903
Colin L LambDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-4180
Bree A GearyDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-3951
Alexis D MitchellDepartment of Psychological Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-5178
Chrystyna D KourosDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-8611
Sara LevensDepartment of Psychological Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7512-4495
Laura E MartinDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9800-9278

Funding

Positive Affect, Future Thinking, and Planning: Testing Brief Intervention Components to Optimize a Novel Intervention to Promote Physical ActivityR21CA260360 · NCI · SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY · PI BALDWIN, AUSTIN S · 2021 to 2022
$427k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA260360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsufficient physical activity is associated with various health risks; however, most current physical activity interventions have critical barriers to scalability. Delivering interventions via technology and identifying active and inert components in early-phase development are ways to build more efficient and scalable interventions. We developed a novel intervention to promote physical activity that targets 3 brief guided thinking tasks, separately and in combination, using brief audio recordings: (1) episodic future thinking (EFT), (2) positive affective imagery (PAI), and (3) planning.

objectiveThe aim of this GeT (Guided Thinking) Active study is to optimize a scalable guided thinking intervention to promote physical activity using principles of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Mechanism-focused analyses will inform which components are optimal candidates for inclusion in an intervention package and which need refinement.

methodsWe will enroll 192 participants randomized to receive intervention components delivered via an audio recording that they will listen to prior to weekly in-lab physical activity sessions. Participants in the high dose conditions will also be instructed to listen to the audio recording 4 additional days each week. We will evaluate effects of the components on physical activity over 6 weeks in a 2 (EFT vs recent thinking) × 2 (PAI vs neutral imagery) × 2 (planning vs no planning) × 2 (dose: 5×/week vs 1×/week) full factorial randomized trial.

resultsThe National Cancer Institute funded this study (R21CA260360) on May 13, 2021. Participant recruitment began in February 2022. Data analysis will begin after the completion of data collection.

conclusionsThe GeT Active study will result in a scalable, audio-recorded intervention that will accelerate progress toward the full development of guided thinking interventions to promote physical activity.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05235360; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05235360. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40908.

Indexed as

brief interventionepisodic future thinkingexerciseoptimizationphysical activityplanningpositive affective imagery

Identifiers

PMID36074550
PMCPMC9501674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.