Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074546›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Design, Development, and Testing of BEST4Baby, an mHealth Technology to Support Exclusive Breastfeeding in India: Pilot Study.

Tony Ma, Katie Chang, Amal Alyusuf, Elina Bajracharya, Yukiko Washio, Patricia J Kelly, Roopa M Bellad, Niranjana S Mahantashetti, Umesh Charantimath, Vanessa L Short and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03533725 (Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03533725 nacompletednot on this map

Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas Jefferson UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled247ConditionsBreastfeedingArmsBreastfeeding counseling and education services
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tony MaBenten Technologies, Inc, Manassas, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3092-0572
Katie ChangBenten Technologies, Inc, Manassas, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7948-4065
Amal AlyusufBenten Technologies, Inc, Manassas, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9733-9315
Elina BajracharyaBenten Technologies, Inc, Manassas, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1713-1061
Yukiko WashioSubstance Use, Gender and Applied Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-6507
Patricia J KellyThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-7153
Roopa M BelladKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4383-1704
Niranjana S MahantashettiKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-4073
Umesh CharantimathKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-2798
Vanessa L ShortThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-4078
Parth LalakiaThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-9953
Frances JaegerThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4164-5019
Shivaprasad GoudarKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-7053
Richard DermanThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-1594

Funding

Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby (BEST4Baby)R21TW010609 · FIC · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DERMAN, RICHARD J · 2018 to 2019
$370k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW010609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at 6 months of age in most low- and middle-income countries, including India, is surprisingly low. There is a relative lack of mobile health apps that specifically focus on leveraging the use of peer counselors (PCs) to support mothers as a means of increasing EBF practices in low- and middle-income countries.

objectiveThis study aimed to design, develop, and test the usability of Breastfeeding Education Support Tool for Baby (BEST4Baby), a mobile health app specifically designed to support PCs in providing in-home breastfeeding counseling support to mothers in rural India on optimal breastfeeding practices.

methodsA user-centered design process with an agile development methodology was used. The approach involved stakeholders and mothers who were trained to serve as PCs to guide BEST4Baby's design and development, including the app's content and features. PCs were engaged through focus groups with interactive wireframes. During the 24-month pilot study period, we conducted a feasibility test of the BEST4Baby app with 22 PCs who supported home visits with mothers residing in rural India. The intervention protocol required PCs to provide education and follow mothers using the BEST4Baby app, with 9 scheduled home visits from the late prenatal stage to 6 months post partum. BEST4Baby's usability from the PCs' perspective was assessed using the translated System Usability Scale (SUS).

resultsThe findings of this study align with best practices in user-centered design (ie, understanding user experience, including context with iterative design with stakeholders) to address EBF barriers. This led to the cultural tailoring and contextual alignment of an evidence-based World Health Organization breastfeeding program with an iterative design and agile development of the BEST4Baby app. A total of 22 PCs tested and rated the BEST4Baby app as highly usable, with a mean SUS score of 85.3 (SD 9.1), placing it over the 95th percentile for SUS scores. The approach translated into a highly usable BEST4Baby app for use by PCs in breastfeeding counseling, which also statistically increased EBF practices.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that BEST4Baby was highly usable and accepted by mothers serving as PCs to support other mothers in their EBF practices and led to positive outcomes in the intervention group's EBF rates. The pilot study demonstrated that using the specially designed BEST4Baby app was an important support tool for mothers to serve as PCs during the 9 home visits.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03533725; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03533725.

Indexed as

agilebreastfeedinglow- and middle-income countriesmHealthmobile healthmobile phonepeer counselorsruraltask shiftingusabilityuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID36074546
PMCPMC9501669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.