Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074466›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Change in the Parent-Clinician Relationship Throughout the First Year of Treatment in Pediatric Oncology.

Jennifer W Mack, Tim Jaung, Hajime Uno, Julienne Brackett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer W MackDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tim JaungDivision of Population Sciences' Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hajime UnoDivision of Population Sciences' Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julienne BrackettSection of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Challenges in the therapeutic relationship between clinicians and parents of children with cancer have been shown to emerge immediately after diagnosis, but little is known about whether such relationships improve over time. Objective: To better understand the potential evolution of parent-clinician relationships over the first year after diagnosis of pediatric cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted from November 2015 to September 2020 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital and Texas Children's Hospital. Participants were oncology clinicians (attending physicians and fellows or nurse practitioners) and parents of children (aged <18 years) with a cancer diagnosis. Surveys were completed at study enrollment (soon after diagnosis [baseline]) and at the 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Exposures: Children had to have had at least 3 previous clinical visits with a primary oncology clinician. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey instruments included the parent and clinician versions of the Relationship Challenges Scale, and factors associated with changes in relationships, including parental, clinician, and health care system attributes, were measured. Results: Survey participants included 150 parents (118 women [78.7%]; 98 with White race and ethnicity [65.3%]) and 49 clinicians (39 [79.6%] women; 39 with White race and ethnicity [79.6%]). Parents reported on 175 relationships with clinicians, and clinicians reported on 98 relationships with parents at all 3 time points (baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up). Of the 175 relationships, 33 (18.9%) were considered to be challenging by parents at baseline, 27 (15.4%) were considered to be challenging at the 3-month follow-up, and 32 (18.3%) were considered to be challenging at the 12-month follow-up. Of the 33 challenging relationships at baseline, 20 (60.6%) resolved at the 12-month follow-up, whereas 13 (39.4%) had persistent challenges. However, 19 relationships that were not challenging at baseline had new challenges at the 12-month follow-up, corresponding to 59.4% of all challenges at the 12-month follow-up. No clinician behaviors were associated with improvement. Strategies used frequently (≥50%) by clinicians in their relationships that were associated with improvement included holding family meetings, apologizing, adapting to the parent's communication style, and devoting extra time and attention. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study showed that some parents experienced challenging relationships with their child's oncology clinicians beginning at diagnosis and throughout the first year after diagnosis. Although many such relationships improved, others worsened, reflecting the vulnerable and stressful nature of parent-clinician relationships.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsParentsChildCommunicationFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36074466
PMCPMC9459655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.