Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074392›Full record

Trial reportRevista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes2022

Evaluation of pain and opioid consumption in local preemptive anesthesia and the erector spine plane block in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Ighor Pallu, Sofia DE Souza Boscoli, Tania Zaleski, Diancarlos Pereira DE Andrade, Guilherme Rodrigo Lobo Cherubini, Alexandra Ingrid Dos Santos Czepula, Juliano Mendes DE Souza

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ighor Pallu- Faculdades Pequeno Principe, Curso de Medicina - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-6429
Sofia DE Souza Boscoli- Faculdades Pequeno Principe, Curso de Medicina - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-4484
Tania Zaleski- Faculdades Pequeno Principe, Curso de Medicina - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7426-7312
Diancarlos Pereira DE Andrade- Faculdades Pequeno Principe, Curso de Medicina - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-898X
Guilherme Rodrigo Lobo Cherubini- Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Departamento de Anestesiologia - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8029-9580
Alexandra Ingrid Dos Santos Czepula- Faculdades Pequeno Principe, Curso de Medicina - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1622-997X
Juliano Mendes DE Souza- Faculdades Pequeno Principe, Curso de Medicina - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-5444
Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveassess pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing anesthetic techniques of spinal erector plane block and local anesthetic block in video-assisted thoracic surgery in the immediate postoperative period.

methodsninety-two patients undergoing video assisted thoracic surgery were randomized to receive ESPB or BAL before starting the surgical procedure. Using the numerical verbal scale, the primary outcome assessed was the patient's pain in the immediate postoperative period (POI). The secondary outcome comprises the assessment of opioid consumption in the IPP by quantifying the medication used in an equianalgesic dose of morphine expressed in milligrams, in the immediate post-anesthetic recovery period, 6h, 12h, and 24h after surgery.

resultsthe EVN scores in the LBA and ESPB group in the POI had a mean of 0,8 (±1,89) vs 0,58 (±2,02) in the post-anesthesia care room (REPAI), 1,06 (±2,00) vs 1,30 (±2,30) in 6 hours of POI, 0,84 (±1,74) vs 1,19 (±2,01) within 12 hours of POI and 0,95 (±1,88) vs 1 ( ±1,66) within 24 hours of POI, all with p>0.05. Mean opioid consumption in the BAL and ESPB groups in the POI was 12.9 (± 10.4) mg vs 14.9 (±10.2) mg, respectively, with p = 0.416. Sixteen participants in the ESPB group and seventeen in the BAL group did not use opioids during the first 24 hours of the PO analyzed.

conclusionlocal anesthesic block and ESP block techniques showed similar results in terms of low pain scores and opioid consumption during the period evaluated.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidNerve BlockAnesthetics, LocalHumansPostoperative PainThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedUltrasonography, InterventionalAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID36074392
PMCPMC10578843
OpenAlexW4294608932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.