Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074302›Full record

ArticleOecologia2022

Responses of bryosphere fauna to drought across a boreal forest chronosequence.

Roger Grau-Andrés, Sylvia Thieffry, Shanyi Tian, David A Wardle, Paul Kardol

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Roger Grau-AndrésDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden. roger.grau.andres@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9020-1276
Sylvia ThieffryDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.
Shanyi TianDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.
David A WardleAsian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-7335
Paul KardolDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-3435
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SENanjing Agricultural University · CNNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2017-00366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Projected changes in precipitation regimes can greatly impact soil biota, which in turn alters key ecosystem functions. In moss-dominated ecosystems, the bryosphere (i.e., the ground moss layer including live and senesced moss) plays a key role in carbon and nutrient cycling, and it hosts high abundances of microfauna (i.e., nematodes and tardigrades) and mesofauna (i.e., mites and springtails). However, we know very little about how bryosphere fauna responds to precipitation, and whether this response changes across environmental gradients. Here, we used a mesocosm experiment to study the effect of volume and frequency of precipitation on the abundance and community composition of functional groups of bryosphere fauna. Hylocomium splendens bryospheres were sampled from a long-term post-fire boreal forest chronosequence in northern Sweden which varies greatly in environmental conditions. We found that reduced precipitation promoted the abundance of total microfauna and of total mesofauna, but impaired predaceous/omnivorous nematodes, and springtails. Generally, bryosphere fauna responded more strongly to precipitation volume than to precipitation frequency. For some faunal functional groups, the effects of precipitation frequency were stronger at reduced precipitation volumes. Context-dependency effects were found for microfauna only: microfauna was more sensitive to precipitation in late-successional forests (i.e., those with lower productivity and soil nutrient availability) than in earlier-successional forests. Our results also suggest that drought-induced changes in trophic interactions and food resources in the bryosphere may increase faunal abundance. Consequently, drier bryospheres that may result from climate change could promote carbon and nutrient turnover from fauna activity, especially in older, less productive forests.

Indexed as

NematodaTaigaAnimalsCarbonDroughtsEcosystemForestsSoilCarbonSoilClimate changeMitesMossNematodesPrecipitation

Identifiers

PMID36074302
PMCPMC9547781
OpenAlexW4294991257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.