Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074287›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2023

Pesticides monitoring in surface water of a subsistence agricultural catchment in Uganda using passive samplers.

Christelle Oltramare, Frederik T Weiss, Philipp Staudacher, Oscar Kibirango, Aggrey Atuhaire, Christian Stamm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Empirical model to assess leaching of pesticides in soil under a steady-state flow and tropical conditions.International journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christelle OltramareEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-6557
Frederik T WeissEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Philipp StaudacherEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-1519
Oscar KibirangoDirectorate of Government Analytical Laboratory (DGAL), Ministry of Internal Affairs, Kampala, Uganda.
Aggrey AtuhaireUganda National Association of Community and Occupational Health (UNACOH), Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1707-5477
Christian StammEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland. christian.stamm@eawag.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-6535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticides are intensely used in the agricultural sector worldwide including smallholder farming. Poor pesticide use practices in this agronomic setting are well documented and may impair the quality of water resources. However, empirical data on pesticide occurrence in water bodies of tropical smallholder agriculture is scarce. Many available data are focusing on apolar organochlorine compounds which are globally banned. We address this gap by studying the occurrence of a broad range of more modern pesticides in an agricultural watershed in Uganda. During 2.5 months of the rainy season in 2017, three passive sampler systems were deployed at five locations in River Mayanja to collect 14 days of composite samples. Grab samples were taken from drinking water resources. In these samples, 27 compounds out of 265 organic pesticides including 60 transformation products were detected. In the drinking water resources, we detected eight pesticides and two insecticide transformation products in low concentrations between 1 and 50 ng/L. Also, in the small streams and open fetch ponds, detected concentrations were generally low with a few exceptions for the herbicide 2,4-D and the fungicide carbendazim exceeding 1 ug/L. The widespread occurrence of chlorpyrifos posed the largest risk for macroinvertebrates. The extensive detection of this compound and its transformation product 3,4,5-trichloro-2-pyridinol was unexpected and called for a better understanding of the use and fate of this pesticide.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterPesticidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAgricultureEnvironmental MonitoringRiversUgandaDrinking WaterPesticidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking waterEnvironmental monitoringHigh-resolution mass spectrometryPassive samplingPesticidesSmallholder farmingSurface waterUganda

Identifiers

PMID36074287
PMCPMC9898397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.