Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074262›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Visual ensemble selection of deep convolutional neural networks for 3D segmentation of breast tumors on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Masoomeh Rahimpour, Marie-Judith Saint Martin, Frédérique Frouin, Pia Akl, Fanny Orlhac, Michel Koole, Caroline Malhaire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masoomeh Rahimpour *Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1713-9394
Marie-Judith Saint Martin *Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Bâtiment 101B Rue de la Chaufferie, 91400, Orsay, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3380-6687
Frédérique FrouinLaboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Bâtiment 101B Rue de la Chaufferie, 91400, Orsay, France. frederique.frouin@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7288-1543
Pia AklDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Fanny OrlhacLaboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Bâtiment 101B Rue de la Chaufferie, 91400, Orsay, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-1867
Michel Koole *Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-640X
Caroline Malhaire *Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Bâtiment 101B Rue de la Chaufferie, 91400, Orsay, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9235-9816

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 764458Institut Curie Bourse Curie M2 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a visual ensemble selection of deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) for 3D segmentation of breast tumors using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (T1-DCE) MRI.

methodsMulti-center 3D T1-DCE MRI (n = 141) were acquired for a cohort of patients diagnosed with locally advanced or aggressive breast cancer. Tumor lesions of 111 scans were equally divided between two radiologists and segmented for training. The additional 30 scans were segmented independently by both radiologists for testing. Three 3D U-Net models were trained using either post-contrast images or a combination of post-contrast and subtraction images fused at either the image or the feature level. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD95) and scored qualitatively by a radiologist as excellent, useful, helpful, or unacceptable. Based on this score, a visual ensemble approach selecting the best segmentation among these three models was proposed.

resultsThe mean and standard deviation of DSC and HD95 between the two radiologists were equal to 77.8 ± 10.0% and 5.2 ± 5.9 mm. Using the visual ensemble selection, a DSC and HD95 equal to 78.1 ± 16.2% and 14.1 ± 40.8 mm was reached. The qualitative assessment was excellent (resp. excellent or useful) in 50% (resp. 77%).

conclusionUsing subtraction images in addition to post-contrast images provided complementary information for 3D segmentation of breast lesions by CNN. A visual ensemble selection allowing the radiologist to select the most optimal segmentation obtained by the three 3D U-Net models achieved comparable results to inter-radiologist agreement, yielding 77% segmented volumes considered excellent or useful. KEY POINTS: • Deep convolutional neural networks were developed using T1-weighted post-contrast and subtraction MRI to perform automated 3D segmentation of breast tumors. • A visual ensemble selection allowing the radiologist to choose the best segmentation among the three 3D U-Net models outperformed each of the three models. • The visual ensemble selection provided clinically useful segmentations in 77% of cases, potentially allowing for a valuable reduction of the manual 3D segmentation workload for the radiologist and greatly facilitating quantitative studies on non-invasive biomarker in breast MRI.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerBreast neoplasmsImage processing, computer-assistedMagnetic resonance imagingNeural networks, computer

Identifiers

PMID36074262
PMCPMC9889463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.