ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2022
[Why trabeculectomy is better than its reputation].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of a Modified Trabeculectomy Technique With Standard Trabeculectomy in Respect to Effectivity and Complication Rates.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of the novel MIGS implant Wistend compared to Kahook Dual Blade in the treatment of experimental ocular hypertension in rabbits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anterior segment parameters after trabeculectomy in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma versus primary open-angle glaucoma.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrabeculectomy (TE) remains one of the most frequently performed glaucoma procedures. This surgery enables sufficient reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and freedom from using eye drops; however, complication management and time-consuming postoperative care make many ophthalmic surgeons reluctant to include TE in their treatment regimen.
aimThis review presents the value of TE compared to other forms of filtering and nonfiltering glaucoma surgery.
conclusionThe use of TE is still the most effective method for lowering IOP and in comparison to other forms of glaucoma surgery in most cases enables freedom from eye drops with a subsequent high quality of life. Postoperative complications occur more frequently, but usually heal spontaneously or can be treated adequately and safely by surgery; however, TE requires intensive postoperative care, which should not be neglected. Repeated surgery due to insufficient IOP reduction is less frequent compared to other forms of glaucoma surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.