Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074164›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Drug treatment of osteonecrosis].

Andreas Roth, Uwe Maus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas RothKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Bereich Endoprothetik/Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 20, Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. andreas.roth@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Uwe MausKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medicinal treatment of osteonecrosis is described as part of the conservative treatment for atraumatic femoral head necrosis of the hip in adults and for Ahlbäck's disease of the knee joint. For femoral head necrosis, iloprost is used in the early stages (ARCO I and II) as a treatment attempt to eliminate pain and the accompanying bone marrow edema. This also applies to the use of bisphosphonates, whereby preferably small defects (< 30%) are suitable for treatment. Bisphosphonates are successfully used in the knee joint to treat Ahlbäck's disease, although the results are sometimes contradictory. Other locations, such as the humeral head, talus, scaphoid, lunate, proximal tibia, and metatarsal head, are sometimes successfully treated with bisphosphonates. Although the results seem promising, the groups are far too small to derive treatment recommendations in this regard.

Indexed as

Femur Head NecrosisDiphosphonatesEdemaFemur HeadHumansIloprostDiphosphonatesIloprostBisphosphonatesConservative therapyFemoral head necrosisIloprostPain

Identifiers

PMID36074164
OpenAlexW4294992073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.