Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36074034›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2022

Understanding PrEP decision making among pregnant women in Lilongwe, Malawi: A mixed-methods study.

Lauren M Hill, Carol E Golin, Friday Saidi, Twambilile Phanga, Jennifer Tseka, Alinda Young, Lisa D Pearce, Suzanne Maman, Benjamin H Chi, Wilbroad Mutale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren M HillDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9444-4435
Carol E GolinDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Friday SaidiUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Twambilile PhangaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jennifer TsekaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Alinda YoungDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Lisa D PearceDepartment of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Suzanne MamanDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Benjamin H ChiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-8455
Wilbroad MutaleDepartment of Health Policy, University of Zambia School of Public Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
UJMT – ORWH – Gazzetta, Issa-BoubeD43TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI William Checkley, Benjamin H. Chi · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Malawi HIV Implementation Research Scientist Training Program (MHIRST)D43TW010060 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MINA CHRISTINE HOSSEINIPOUR, Victor Mwapasa · 2015 to 2026
$3.8M
A dyad approach to combination HIV prevention in pregnancy for Zambia and MalawiR01AI131060 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H., MUTALE, WILBROAD · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
The UNC-UNZA-Wits Partnership for HIV and Women's Reproductive HealthD43TW010558 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H., CHIBWESHA, CARLA J · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
Mentoring new investigators in PMTCT implementation researchK24AI120796 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Benjamin H. Chi · 2016 to 2026
$1.3M
Promoting PrEP shared decision-making and adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women in ZambiaK01MH121186 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HILL, LAUREN · 2020 to 2024
$906k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009340FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010060FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010558NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI120796NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI131060NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121186NIMH NIH HHS K24 AI120796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a promising tool for HIV prevention during pregnancy. With increasing rollout in antenatal settings, counselling strategies to help pregnant women make appropriate decisions about PrEP use are needed. Understanding women's motivations and concerns for PrEP use-and how these inform their decision making and feelings about the decision to start PrEP-are critical to inform these strategies.

methodsWe conducted a convergent mixed-methods study from June 2020 to June 2021 in the context of a PrEP adherence support trial among HIV-negative pregnant women in Lilongwe, Malawi. Two hundred women completed a survey reporting their motivations and concerns about PrEP use, and their feelings about the decision to start PrEP (Decisional Regret Scale). Thirty women completed in-depth interviews to better understand the decision-making process, including motivations and concerns weighed in women's decision to use PrEP. Analyses comprised descriptive and bivariate statistics, thematic qualitative analysis, and integration of quantitative and qualitative results.

resultsWomen initiating PrEP during pregnancy were highly motivated to obtain HIV protection for themselves and their unborn child, often due to perceived HIV risk connoted by a recent sexually transmitted infection and/or concerns about partner non-monogamy. These motivations prevailed despite some concerns about safety and side effects, anticipated stigmatization, and concerns about adherence burden and pill attributes. Many women had informed their partner of their decision to use PrEP yet few felt their decision was contingent upon partner approval. Most women felt positively about the decision to start PrEP (mean decisional regret = 1.2 out of 5), but those with a greater number of concerns reported greater decisional regret (B = 0.036; p = 0.005). Furthermore, women who were specifically concerned about partner disclosure, who disliked pills or who had no perceived HIV risk reported greater decisional regret.

conclusionsPregnant women were strongly motivated by the promise of HIV protection offered by PrEP and accepted it despite diverse concerns. A shared decision-making approach that centres pregnant women and offers partner involvement may help identify and address initial concerns about PrEP use and support prevention-effective use of PrEP during this important period.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisDecision MakingFemaleHumansMalawiPregnancyPregnant PeopleAnti-HIV Agentsdecision-makingHIVMalawipregnancyPrEPwomen

Identifiers

PMID36074034
PMCPMC9454413
OpenAlexW4294991519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.