Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36073737›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2022

Impact of fruit and vegetable benefits on pregnancy outcomes among WIC participants: a natural experiment.

Guangyi Wang, Hilary Seligman, Ronli Levi, Rita Hamad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guangyi WangPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-0149
Hilary SeligmanPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ronli LeviDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6915-4903
Rita HamadPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lee University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK098722 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHRISTIAN VAISSE · 2015 to 2026
$14.6M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Evaluation of Natural Experiments of Nutrition Assistance to Prevent and Control Diabetes among Low-Income CommunitiesU18DP006526 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHILLINGER, DEAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U18 DP006526NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK098722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper nutrition is critical for maternal and neonatal health. In January 2017, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in San Francisco, California, began providing an additional $40 per month in fruit and vegetable (F&V) benefits to pregnant clients with the goal of improving food security and nutrition-related outcomes. We evaluated whether pregnant women on WIC who received this additional F&V benefit exhibited better perinatal and birth outcomes compared with those who received standard WIC benefits. We used 2010-2019 birth certificate data from the National Center for Health Statistics. The intervention group consisted of WIC participants living in San Francisco (SF) County (intervention county) and whose first trimester started after January 2017. We used a quasi-experimental synthetic control method to compare trends between the intervention and control groups (a weighted sample of other California counties that did not distribute additional F&V benefits). Outcomes included low birth weight, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age, gestational diabetes, and gestational weight gain. No significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes among WIC recipients in SF and synthetic control group were observed after the F&V benefits were distributed. Prior studies have shown that additional F&V benefits have positive effects on maternal and infant outcomes, indicating that F&V vouchers are a promising strategy for supporting equitable health outcomes. Our null results suggest that more rigorous research is needed to determine their optimal dose and duration, especially in high-cost-of-living areas, and to examine more upstream and structural interventions.

Indexed as

Premature BirthVegetablesChildFemaleFruitHumansInfant, NewbornMotivationPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeChildren program (WIC)Fruit and vegetable benefitsInfantsNutritionPerinatal and birth outcomesSpecial Supplemental Nutrition Program for WomenSynthetic controls

Identifiers

PMID36073737
PMCPMC9668343
OpenAlexW4294991215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.