Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36073721›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2022

Identification and Re-consent of Existing Cord Blood Donors for Creation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines for Potential Clinical Applications.

Keren M Abberton, Tricia L McDonald, Mary Diviney, Rhonda Holdsworth, Stephen Leslie, Martin B Delatycki, Lin Liu, Guy Klamer, Phillip Johnson, Ngaire J Elwood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Current Landscape of iPSC Haplobanks.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Keren M AbbertonBMDI Cord Blood Bank, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-9725
Tricia L McDonaldBMDI Cord Blood Bank, Melbourne, Australia.
Mary DivineyVTIS at Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Australia.
Rhonda HoldsworthVTIS at Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Australia.
Stephen LeslieSchools of Mathematics and Statistics, and BioSciences, Melbourne Integrative Genomics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Martin B DelatyckiMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Lin LiuBMDI Cord Blood Bank, Melbourne, Australia.
Guy KlamerSydney Cord Blood Bank, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, Australia.
Phillip JohnsonQueensland Cord Blood Bank At The Mater, Brisbane, Australia.
Ngaire J ElwoodBMDI Cord Blood Bank, Melbourne, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUAustralian Red Cross Lifeblood · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUSydney Children’s Hospitals Network · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim to create a bank of clinical grade cord blood-derived induced pluripotent stem cell lines in order to facilitate clinical research leading to the development of new cellular therapies. Here we present a clear pathway toward the creation of such a resource, within a strong quality framework, and with the appropriate regulatory, government and ethics approvals, along with a dynamic follow-up and re-consent process of cord blood donors from the public BMDI Cord Blood Bank. Interrogation of the cord blood bank inventory and next generation sequencing was used to identify and confirm 18 donors with suitable HLA homozygous haplotypes. Regulatory challenges that may affect global acceptance of the cell lines, along with the quality standards required to operate as part of a global network, are being met by working in collaboration with bodies such as the International Stem Cell Banking Initiative (ISCBI) and the Global Alliance for iPSC Therapies (GAiT). Ethics approval was granted by an Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee, and government approval has been obtained to use banked cord blood for this purpose. New issues of whole-genome sequencing and the relevant donor safeguards and protections were considered with input from clinical genetics services, including the rights and information flow to donors, and commercialization aspects. The success of these processes has confirmed feasibility and utility of using banked cord blood to produce clinical-grade iPSC lines for potential cellular therapies.

Indexed as

Fetal BloodInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsBlood BanksBlood DonorsHumansInformed Consentcord blood and cord tissue bankingdonor re-consentethicsHLA haplotypeinduced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)

Identifiers

PMID36073721
PMCPMC9585951
OpenAlexW4294991901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.