Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36073662›Full record

ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2022

Utility of constructed wetlands for treatment of hospital effluent and antibiotic resistant bacteria in resource limited settings: A case study in Ujjain, India.

Vivek Parashar, Surya Singh, Manju R Purohit, Ashok J Tamhankar, Dharmpal Singh, Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg, Vishal Diwan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Towards Effective, Sustainable Solution for Hospital Wastewater Treatment to Cope with the Post-Pandemic Era.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vivek ParasharR.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Surya SinghDivision of Environmental Monitoring and Exposure Assessment (Water & Soil), ICMR - National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal, India.
Manju R PurohitR.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Ashok J TamhankarR.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Dharmpal SinghR.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Madhanraj KalyanasundaramICMR - National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
Cecilia Stålsby LundborgDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Vishal DiwanDivision of Environmental Monitoring and Exposure Assessment (Water & Soil), ICMR - National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal, India.
Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College · INICMR National Institute for Research in Environmental HealthKarolinska Institutet · SENational Institute of Epidemiology · IN

Funding

Swedish Research Council 2017-01237Swedish Research Council 521-2012-2889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing generation of wastewater and its indiscriminate disposal is detrimental to human and animal health. Resource-limited settings often struggle for efficient wastewater treatment systems owing to lack of funds and operational difficulties. Therefore, alternative treatment systems involving low expenditure and simplistic operations are need of the hour. Constructed wetlands are one such alternative that can efficiently remove variety of pollutants from wastewater. In this study, we have assessed the utility of constructed wetlands for treatment of hospital wastewater in Ujjain. An in-house wetland system was designed and constructed using Typha latifolia and Phragmites karka. Results showed that wetland was efficient for removal of various physico-chemical and biological contaminants, namely, biochemical-oxygen-demand (77.1%), chemical-oxygen-demand (64.9%), turbidity (68.3%), suspended-solids (63%), total-phosphorus (58.7%), nitrate-nitrogen (33%), fecal coliforms (96.8%), and total coliforms (95.6%). Paired t test revealed that removal efficiencies for various parameters were significantly different among Phragmites, Typha, and control cells (p ≤ 0.05). Study also depicted that most of the bacterial isolates in inlet wastewater were selectively resistant to antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and sulphamethaxazole) as well and these isolates were also removed. Precisely, Typha was fairly suitable for antibiotic resistant bacteria removal. Thus, constructed wetlands were found to be one of the suitable options for wastewater treatment in resource-limited settings. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Constructed wetlands are one of the suitable options for wastewater treatment in resource limited settings. These systems involve wetland vegetation, soil, and associated microbial assemblages to improve the water quality. Typha and Phragmites were found to be efficient for treating the hospital wastewater. Experiments showed that antibiotic resistant bacteria may also be removed through constructed wetland systems. Easy operation, cost effectiveness, and efficiency are important attributes.

Indexed as

WastewaterWetlandsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaHospitalsHumansOxygenPoaceaeWaste Disposal, FluidAnti-Bacterial AgentsOxygenWastewaterantibiotic resistant bacteriaconstructed wetlandsPhragmitesTyphawastewater

Identifiers

PMID36073662
PMCPMC9544608
OpenAlexW4292707584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.