Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36073661›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2022

Female-friendly toilets in schools in Burkina Faso: A mixed-methods study using photo-elicitation.

Teresa Buitrago-García, N Hélène Sawadogo, Aurélia Souares, Jean-Louis Koulidiati, Ali Sié, Till Bärnighausen, Sarah Langlotz, Shannon A McMahon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Teresa Buitrago-GarcíaHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
N Hélène SawadogoNouna Health Research Centre, Nouna, Burkina Faso.
Aurélia SouaresHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jean-Louis KoulidiatiHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ali SiéHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah LanglotzChair of Development Economics (Prof. Fuchs), Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Shannon A McMahonHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEAfrica Health Research Institute · ZACentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna · BFJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An absence of gender-sensitive sanitation facilities in schools and the negative effects this has on girls has been widely discussed among advocacy groups, though less examined in academic spheres. Drawing on triangulated data, we outline current challenges and respondent-driven solutions to enhance the female-friendly nature of toilets in a context of extreme poverty. Methods: This mixed-methods study was informed by the tenets of human-centred design. We first quantitatively assessed facilities in 14 secondary schools in the Kossi Province of Burkina Faso. We then collected qualitative data, including 15 focus group discussions and 53 in-depth interviews among schoolgirls, mothers, teachers and key informants. We applied photo-elicitation, a novel method, to explore perceptions of facilities and the desirability and feasibility of interventions to improve gender-friendly sanitation facilities. Results: No school met international water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) standards for schools. Roughly one third of schools did not have water and, when present, there was no reliable way to use it within the toilet complex. Schoolgirls shared feelings of shame and stress when menstruating at school, and said that they would avoid using school toilets, if possible. Schoolgirls described water access as the most urgent need to address, followed by fostering privacy and facilitating cleanliness within facilities. Mothers and teachers mostly aligned with these priorities, while key informants additionally emphasised the need to raise awareness on both general and menstrual hygiene and to develop maintenance systems. Photo-elicitation engaged and empowered participants to pinpoint priorities and concrete solutions, namely a need for doors and locks, water containers and cleaning materials. Conclusions: WASH needs in many schools remain unmet. Women and girls should be involved in decision-making across stages of intervention design and implementation. Young women's voices merit greater inclusion in academic literature. Future interventions should enhance access to water and privacy. Future research could explore maintenance and monitoring strategies to develop guidance on sustainable solutions.

Indexed as

Bathroom EquipmentHygieneBurkina FasoFemaleHumansMenstruationSchoolsWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID36073661
PMCPMC9454237
OpenAlexW4294991081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.