Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36073648›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Nonadherence by Serum Drug Analyses in Resistant Hypertension: 7-Year Follow-Up of Patients Considered Adherent by Directly Observed Therapy.

Lene V Halvorsen, Ola U Bergland, Camilla L Søraas, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Ulla Hjørnholm, Vibeke N Kjær, Marianne K Kringen, Per-Erik Clasen, Renate Haldsrud, Sverre E Kjeldsen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Blood Never Lies: The PopPK-Based Lie Detector.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Arterial Hypertension.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Medical Telemonitoring for the Management of Hypertension in Older Patients in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lene V HalvorsenSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-2459
Ola U BerglandSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Camilla L SøraasSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Anne Cecilie K LarstorpSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0223-9248
Ulla HjørnholmSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Vibeke N KjærSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Marianne K KringenCenter for Psychopharmacology Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4760-1693
Per-Erik ClasenDepartment of Pharmacology Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Renate HaldsrudDepartment of Pharmacology Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Sverre E KjeldsenSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2389-0272
Morten RostrupSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Fadl Elmula M Fadl ElmulaSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Mimi S OpdalDepartment of Pharmacology Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.
Aud HøieggenSection of Cardiovascular and Renal Research Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7520-7645
Oslo University Hospital · NODiakonhjemmet Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Measurement of serum concentrations of drugs is a novelty found useful in detecting poor drug adherence in patients taking ≥2 antihypertensive agents. Regarding patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, we previously based our assessment on directly observed therapy. The present study aimed to investigate whether serum drug measurements in patients with resistant hypertension offer additional information regarding drug adherence, beyond that of initial assessment with directly observed therapy. Methods and Results Nineteen patients assumed to have true treatment-resistant hypertension and adherence to antihypertensive drugs based on directly observed therapy were investigated repeatedly through 7 years. Serum concentrations of antihypertensive drugs were measured by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry from blood samples taken at baseline, 6-month, 3-year, and 7-year visits. Cytochrome P450 polymorphisms, self-reported adherence and beliefs about medicine were performed as supplement investigations. Seven patients (37%) were redefined as nonadherent based on their serum concentrations during follow-up. All patients reported high adherence to medications. Nonadherent patients expressed lower necessity and higher concerns regarding intake of antihypertensive medication (

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionDirectly Observed TherapyFollow-Up StudiesHumansMedication AdherenceAntihypertensive Agentsantihypertensive drugsblood pressuredirectly observed therapynonadherenceresistant hypertensionserum drug concentrations

Identifiers

PMID36073648
PMCPMC9683683
OpenAlexW4294992202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.