ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022
Patient perspectives on primary care for multimorbidity: An integrative review.
Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The renewed Development Model for Integrated Care: a systematic review and model update.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Patient partnership in primary health care systems of the future: a structured priority setting exercise.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Eligible but missing out: a qualitative study of access to COVID-19 antivirals in Australia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Epigenetic downregulation of MAPKAPK2 exacerbates oxidative stress-induced damage in vitiligo melanocyte cell line model.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Methods of Engaging Interest-Holders in Healthcare Evidence Syntheses: A Scoping Review.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Review
- "So I call myself healthy": a qualitative study on health perceptions and healthcare experiences in older adults with multimorbidity.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- The untapped potential for healthcare to support recovery for patients with stress-related exhaustion disorder - creating an experience of generalised safety.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Navigating fragmented care: a qualitative study on multimorbidity management challenges in Beijing's tiered healthcare system.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Facilitators, barriers, and recommendations for the implementation of a digital-based case management program: the perspective of Portuguese stakeholders.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Hospital Care Quality According to People Living With Multiple Long-Term Conditions: A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Reviews for multimorbidity risk in people with inflammatory conditions: a qualitative study.BJGP open · 2024Article
- Factors influencing nurse practitioner panel size in team-based primary care: a qualitative case study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- New models of health and social care for people in later life: mapping of innovation in services in two regions of the United Kingdom using a mixed method approach.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the lived experience of people with multimorbidity in low- and middle-income countries.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Self-care management and experiences of using telemonitoring as support when living with hypertension or heart failure: A descriptive qualitative study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023Article
- Barriers to and enablers of the promotion of patient and family participation in primary healthcare nursing in Brazil, Germany and Spain: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Patient perspectives on primary care for multimorbidity: An integrative review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Review
- Perceived benefits and barriers of multidisciplinary teams in the management of diabetes and comorbidities among physicians: A qualitative double-center study.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
- Article
- Perceptions and experiences of living with and providing care for multimorbidity: A qualitative interview study.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImproving healthcare for people with multiple chronic or ongoing conditions is receiving increased attention, particularly due to the growing number of people experiencing multimorbidity (MM) and concerns about the sustainability of the healthcare system. Primary care has been promoted as an important resource for supporting people with MM to live well with their conditions and to prevent unnecessary use of health care services. However, traditional primary care has been criticized for not centring the needs and preferences of people with MM themselves. Our aim was to conduct a review that centred on the perspective of people with MM in multiple ways, including having patient partners co-lead the design, conduct and reporting of findings, and focusing on literature that reported the perspective of people with MM, irrespective of it being experimental or nonexperimental.
methodsWe searched for published literature in CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost) and MEDLINE All (Ovid). Findings from experimental and nonexperimental studies were integrated into collaboration with patient partners.
resultsTwenty-nine articles were included in the review. Findings are described in five categories: (1) Care that is tailored to my unique situation; (2) meaningful inclusion in the team; (3) a healthcare team that is ready and able to address my complex needs; (4) supportive relationships and (5) access when and where I need it.
conclusionThis review supports a reorientation of primary care systems to better reflect the experiences and perspectives of people with MM. This can be accomplished by involving patient partners in the design and evaluation of primary care services and incentivizing collaboration among health and social supports and services for people with MM. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient partners were involved in the design and conduct of this review, and in the preparation of the manuscript. Their involvement is further elucidated in the manuscript text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.