Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36073241›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

COVID-19 Vaccination Concerns and Reasons for Acceptance Among US Health Care Personnel.

Lindsay M S Oberleitner, Victoria C Lucia, Mark C Navin, Melissa Ozdych, Nelia M Afonso, Richard H Kennedy, Hans Keil, Lawrence Wu, Trini A Mathew

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay M S OberleitnerWilliam Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1390-4821
Victoria C LuciaWilliam Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
Mark C NavinWilliam Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
Melissa OzdychBeaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Nelia M AfonsoWilliam Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
Richard H KennedyWilliam Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
Hans KeilBeaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Lawrence WuBeaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Trini A MathewWilliam Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
Oakland University · USBeaumont Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBecause health care personnel (HCP) are potentially at increased risk of contracting COVID-19, high vaccination rates in this population are essential. The objective of this study was to assess vaccination status, barriers to vaccination, reasons for vaccine acceptance, and concerns about COVID-19 vaccination among HCP.

methodsWe conducted an anonymous online survey at a large US health care system from April 9 through May 4, 2021, to assess COVID-19 vaccination status and endorsement of reasons for acceptance and concerns related to vaccination (based on selections from a provided list).

resultsA total of 4603 HCP (12.2% response rate) completed the survey, 3947 (85.7%) had received at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine at the time of the survey, and 550 (11.9%) reported no plans to receive the vaccine. Unvaccinated HCP were 30 times more likely than vaccinated HCP to endorse religious or personal beliefs as a vaccine concern (odds ratio = 30.95; 95% CI, 21.06-45.48) and 15 times more likely to believe that personal vaccination is not needed if enough others are vaccinated (odds ratio = 14.99; 95% CI, 10.84-20.72). The more reasons endorsed for vaccination (ß = 0.60;

conclusionsOur findings suggest that reasons for vaccination acceptance and concerns about vaccination need to be considered to better understand behavioral choices related to COVID-19 vaccination among HCP, because these beliefs may affect vaccination advocacy, responses to vaccine mandates, and promotion of COVID-19 vaccine boosters.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesattitudesCOVID-19health behaviorvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36073241
PMCPMC9459372
OpenAlexW4294991674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.