Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36073112›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of heart failure2022

Biomarkers in heart failure clinical trials. A review from the Biomarkers Working Group of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Antoni Bayes-Genis, Alberto Aimo, Pardeep Jhund, Mark Richards, Rudolf A de Boer, Henrike Arfsten, Iacopo Fabiani, Josep Lupón, Stefan D Anker, Arantxa González and 17 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. 2024 update in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Antoni Bayes-GenisInstitut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3044-197X
Alberto AimoScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Pardeep JhundInstitute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Mark RichardsUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Rudolf A de BoerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henrike ArfstenClinical Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Iacopo FabianiCardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
Josep LupónInstitut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK), and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapy (BCRT), German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Arantxa GonzálezCIBERCV, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.
Vincenzo CastiglioneScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Marco MetraCardiology Department, ASST Spedali Civili; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Christian MuellerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Julio NúñezCIBERCV, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.
Patrick RossignolAcademic Hospital (CHU), Nancy, France.
Andrea BarisonCardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
Javed ButlerDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
John TeerlinkHeart Failure and of the Echocardiography Laboratory, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gerasimos FilippatosHF Unit, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Piotr PonikowskiCentre for Heart Diseases, University Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland.
Giuseppe VergaroScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Faiez ZannadUniversité de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-Plurithématique 1433, and Inserm U1116 CHRU Nancy, F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.
Petar SeferovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Giuseppe RosanoIRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.
Andrew J S CoatsUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Michele EmdinScuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
James L JanuzziMassachusetts General Hospital and Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA, USA.
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio · ITCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESInserm · FRInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITJackson Memorial Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMedical University of Vienna · ATSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USSerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts · RSSurgical Specialties (Canada) · CAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de València · ESUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GRUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approval of new heart failure (HF) therapies has slowed over the past two decades in part due to the high costs of conducting large randomized clinical trials that are needed to adequately power major clinical endpoint studies. Several biomarkers have been identified reflecting different elements of HF pathophysiology, with possible applications in diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and even in the design of clinical trials. Biomarkers could potentially be used to refine study inclusion criteria to enable enrolment of patients who are more likely to respond to a therapeutic intervention, despite being at sufficient risk to meet pre-determined study endpoint rates. When there is a close relationship between biomarker levels and clinical endpoints, changes in biomarker levels after a given treatment can act as a surrogate endpoint, potentially reducing the duration and cost of a clinical trial. Natriuretic peptides have been widely used in clinical trials with a variable amount of added value, which such variation being probably due to the absence of a close pathophysiological connection to the study drug. Notable exceptions to this include sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat. Future studies should seek to adopt unbiased approaches for discovery of true companion diagnostics; with -omics-based tools, biomarkers might be more precisely selected for use in clinical trials to identify responses that closely reflect the biological effects of the drug under investigation. Finally, biomarkers associated with cardiac damage and remodelling, such as cardiac troponin, could be employed as safety endpoints provided that standardization between different assays is achieved.

Indexed as

CardiologyHeart FailureAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiomarkersBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsHumansTetrazolesValsartanAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiomarkersBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationssacubitrilTetrazolesValsartanBiomarkersClinical trialsCriteriaInclusionNatriuretic peptides-OmicsRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID36073112
OpenAlexW4294991228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.