ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Prediction of survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using machine learning algorithms: A study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognosing post-treatment outcomes of head and neck cancer using structured data and machine learning: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Prediction of lung papillary adenocarcinoma-specific survival using ensemble machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Virus infections and cancers: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of first-line tislelizumab for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer using a comparative validation of traditional survival and machine learning models.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Creation of a machine learning-based prognostic prediction model for various subtypes of laryngeal cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting overall survival in chordoma patients using machine learning models: a web-app application.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- De-escalated radiation for human papillomavirus virus-related oropharyngeal cancer: evolving paradigms and future strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Development and validation of survival prediction model for gastric adenocarcinoma patients using deep learning: A SEER-based study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A deep learning algorithm with good prediction efficacy for cancer-specific survival in osteosarcoma: A retrospective study.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We determined appropriate survival prediction machine learning models for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) using the "Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results" (SEER) database. Methods: In total, 4039 patients diagnosed with OPSCC between 2004 and 2016 were enrolled in this study. In particular, 13 variables were selected and analyzed: age, sex, tumor grade, tumor size, neck dissection, radiation therapy, cancer directed surgery, chemotherapy, T stage, N stage, M stage, clinical stage, and human papillomavirus (HPV) status. The T-, N-, and clinical staging were reconstructed based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, 8th Edition. The patients were randomly assigned to a development or test dataset at a 7:3 ratio. The extremely randomized survival tree (EST), conditional survival forest (CSF), and DeepSurv models were used to predict the overall and disease-specific survival in patients with OPSCC. A 10-fold cross-validation on a development dataset was used to build the training and internal validation data for all models. We evaluated the predictive performance of each model using test datasets. Results: A higher c-index value and lower integrated Brier score (IBS), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) indicate a better performance from a machine learning model. The C-index was the highest for the DeepSurv model (0.77). The IBS was also the lowest in the DeepSurv model (0.08). However, the RMSE and RAE were the lowest for the CSF model. Conclusions: We demonstrated various machine-learning-based survival prediction models. The CSF model showed a better performance in predicting the survival of patients with OPSCC in terms of the RMSE and RAE. In this context, machine learning models based on personalized survival predictions can be used to stratify various complex risk factors. This could help in designing personalized treatments and predicting prognoses for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.