ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Effect of Minimally Invasive Internal Arch Nailing Surgery on Tissue Traumatic Stress Response in Patients with Vertebral Fractures.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the influence of minimally invasive arch root nailing internal fixation surgery on tissue traumatic stress response in patients with vertebral fractures and explore the advantages of this treatment. Methods: One hundred and thirty-six patients with vertebral fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected and divided into two groups based on the treatment method: the control group was treated with open arch root nail internal fixation surgery and the study group was treated with minimally invasive arch root nail internal fixation. The lumbar spine function, ODI, VAS, JOA score, complications, inflammation, and stress response were compared between the two groups. Results: After the operation, the ratio of intervertebral space and anterior edge height increased, and the Cobb angle decreased in both groups; the surgical incision, hospital stay, and operation time in the study group were shorter than those in the control group, and the intraoperative drainage volume and intraoperative blood loss were smaller than those in the control group ( Conclusion: Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation has high safety and obvious advantages. The patient's stress response index and pain level are low, and it will not cause obvious damage to the patient. The postoperative lumbar spine function is significantly improved, which is beneficial to the patient's postoperative recovery. It is easy to operate, will not damage the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae significantly, and the fluoroscopy time is relatively short, and it has a good recovery effect. Therefore, minimally invasive internal arch nailing surgery can be used as the preferred treatment for patients with vertebral fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.