ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022
Strategies to induce natural killer cell tolerance in xenotransplantation.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Present Advances and Emerging Challenges in Kidney Xenotransplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- T cell-mediated immune responses in xenotransplantation: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- M2 macrophage polarization in allogeneic skin transplantation: from intrinsic mechanisms to clinical prospects for immune tolerance.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Differences between xenotransplantation and allogeneic kidney transplantation: the current situation and future challenges in Japan.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Review
- Surveillance and prevention of infection in clinical xenotransplantation.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Cytotoxic Responses Mediated by NK Cells and Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes in Xenotransplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Review
- Immunoprotection Strategies in β-Cell Replacement Therapy: A Closer Look at Porcine Islet Xenotransplantation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Developments in kidney xenotransplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Co-expression of HLA-E and HLA-G on genetically modified porcine endothelial cells attenuates human NK cell-mediated degranulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Eliminating major xenoantigens in pig cells has drastically reduced human antibody-mediated hyperacute xenograft rejection (HXR). Despite these advancements, acute xenograft rejection (AXR) remains one of the major obstacles to clinical xenotransplantation, mediated by innate immune cells, including macrophages, neutrophils, and natural killer (NK) cells. NK cells play an 'effector' role by releasing cytotoxicity granules against xenogeneic cells and an 'affecter' role on other immune cells through cytokine secretion. We highlight the key receptor-ligand interactions that determine the NK cell response to target cells, focusing on the regulation of NK cell activating receptor (NKG2D, DNAM1) and inhibitory receptor (KIR2DL1-4, NKG2A, and LIR-1) signaling pathways. Inhibition of NK cell activity may protect xenografts from cytotoxicity. Recent successful approaches to reducing NK cell-mediated HXR and AXR are reviewed, including genetic modifications of porcine xenografts aimed at improving pig-to-human compatibility. Future directions to promote xenograft acceptance are discussed, including NK cell tolerance in pregnancy and NK cell evasion in viral infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.