Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072500›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2022

Possibilities and constraints of rapid online ethnography: Lessons from a rapid assessment of COVID-19 policy for people who use drugs.

Emery R Eaves, Robert T Trotter, Bonnie Marquez, Kayla Negron, Eck Doerry, David Mensah, Kate A Compton-Gore, Shana A Lanzetta, Kathryn Kruithoff, Kaitlyn Dykman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emery R EavesDepartment of Anthropology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Robert T TrotterDepartment of Anthropology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Bonnie MarquezCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Kayla NegronCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Eck DoerrySchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
David MensahCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Kate A Compton-GoreCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Shana A LanzettaCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Kathryn KruithoffCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Kaitlyn DykmanCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Julie A BaldwinCenter for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.

Funding

SSCIMA: Integrating Analysis of Socio-economic Sub-population Dynamics to Improve Spatial Models of Infectious DiseaseU54MD012388 · NIMHD · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI Samantha Jane Sabo · 2017 to 2026
$49.7M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, health care provision changed rapidly and funding became available to assess pandemic-related policy change. Research activities, however, were limited to contactless, online delivery. It was clear early on that some elements of online rapid ethnography were feasible and effective, while others would not approach traditional ethnographic depth. We conducted an online Rapid Assessment, Response, and Evaluation (RARE) project from August 2020 to September 2021 to understand how COVID-19 policy impacted people who use drugs. Our interdisciplinary research team conducted online ethnographic interviews and focus groups with 45 providers and community stakeholders, and 19 clients from rural and urban areas throughout Arizona. In addition, 26 webinars, online trainings, and virtual conferences focused on opioid policy and medication for opioid use disorders (MOUD) were opportunities to observe conversations among providers and program representatives about how best to implement policy changes, how to reach people in recovery, and what aspects of the changes should carry forward into better all-around opioid services in the future. Our RARE project was successful in collecting a range of providers' perspectives on both rural and urban implementation of take-home MOUDs as well as a wide view of national conversations, but client perspectives were limited to those who were not impacted by the policies and continued to attend in-person daily clinic visits. We describe challenges to online rapid ethnography and how online research may have allowed for an in-depth, but incomplete picture of how policy changes during COVID-19 policy affected people with opioid use disorders.

Indexed as

COVID-19medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD)online ethnographyrapid assessment response and evaluation (RARE)substance use policy

Identifiers

PMID36072500
PMCPMC9441939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.