Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072461›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Acceptance, experiences, and needs of hospitalized pregnant women toward an electronic mindfulness-based intervention: A pilot mixed-methods study.

Claudia Schiele, Maren Goetz, Kathrin Hassdenteufel, Mitho Müller, Johanna Graf, Stephan Zipfel, Stephanie Wallwiener

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06795633 (The Impact of a Holistic Care Program for High-Risk Pregnancies on Stress and Mental Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06795633 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of a Holistic Care Program for High-Risk Pregnancies on Stress and Mental Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorUskudar UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsHigh-risk Pregnancy, Holistic Care, Stress, Prenatal StressArmsHolistic Care Program for High-Risk Pregnancies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia SchieleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maren GoetzDepartment of General Pediatrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kathrin HassdenteufelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mitho MüllerDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Johanna GrafDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephan ZipfelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephanie WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anxiety disorders and depression during pregnancy are highly prevalent. Hospitalized pregnant women with high maternal or fetal risk represent a particularly vulnerable population often excluded from research samples. Screening for mental health disorders is not routinely offered for this particular patient group. Electronic mindfulness-based interventions constitute an accessible, convenient, and cost-effective mental health resource but have not yet been evaluated for acceptance in inpatient settings. To date, little is known about the needs and perceptions of this group of women. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine whether a brief electronic mindfulness-based intervention (eMBI) is accepted among hospitalized high-risk pregnant women. We assessed personal motivation and barriers, experiences, usability requirements, and overall acceptance of the eMBI, as well the specific needs and demands of patients with high-risk pregnancies regarding mental health services. Methods: An exploratory pilot study with a mixed-methods study design was carried out among 30 women hospitalized with a high obstetric risk. The study participants were given access to an eMBI with a 1-week mindfulness program on how to deal with stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the 30 participants and analyzed using systematic content analysis. In addition, acceptance and usability were assessed Results: Study findings showed a high level of acceptance of the eMBI. Most of the respondents were satisfied with the usability and considered the eMBI program to be helpful. The greatest barriers to using the eMBI were a general negative attitude toward using apps, preference for personal contact, or no current need for psychotherapy. Participants criticized the lack of awareness of mental health issues during pregnancy and expressed a need for low-threshold treatment offers, especially during hospitalization. Conclusions: There is a strong need for mental health services in pregnancy care, especially for pregnant women with risk profiles. An eMBI offers an acceptable means of providing mental health support for hospitalized women with a severe obstetric risk.

Indexed as

anxietydepressiondigital interventionhospitalizationmental healthmindfulness-based intervention (MBI)obstetric riskpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36072461
PMCPMC9444059
OpenAlexW4292554338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.