ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2022
Examining equity in a void of evidence - Pharmacist minor ailments services and the role of systematic reviews.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacist minor ailment services (PMAS) are formalised services which remunerate pharmacists for delivering care and providing medicines used to treat minor ailments such as hayfever, musculoskeletal pain, head lice and constipation. PMAS have been postulated to improve medicines access equity yet there is little evidence to suggest that equitable health outcomes from PMAS have been achieved in those countries where these services have been initiated. Systematic reviews are regarded as the gold standard in assessing evidence of outcome effectiveness, including equity of outcomes. Our research team developed a systematic search strategy and review protocol to examine ethnic variation in PMAS outcomes. No results were returned, even with the inclusion of grey literature, and therefore the impact of PMAS on ethnic equity could not be examined. This commentary discusses the potential for PMAS to achieve medicines access equity and the role of empty reviews in identifying gaps in the literature and advocating for equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.