Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072312›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Nitrogen use efficiency in cotton: Challenges and opportunities against environmental constraints.

Adnan Noor Shah, Talha Javed, Rajesh Kumar Singhal, Rubab Shabbir, Depeng Wang, Sadam Hussain, Hirdayesh Anuragi, Dinesh Jinger, Himanshu Pandey, Nader R Abdelsalam and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nutrients and phytochemical density inSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Adnan Noor ShahDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Punjab, Pakistan.
Talha JavedCollege of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Rajesh Kumar SinghalICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India.
Rubab ShabbirCollege of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Depeng WangCollege of Life Science, Linyi University , Linyi, Shandong, China.
Sadam HussainDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Hirdayesh AnuragiICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dinesh JingerICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Himanshu PandeyYSP UHF Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Nader R AbdelsalamAgricultural Botany Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Rehab Y GhareebPlant Protection and Biomolecular Diagnosis Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City of Science Research and Technological Applications, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mariusz JaremkoSmart Health Initiative and Red Sea Research Center, Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNAlexandria University · EGCity of Scientific Research and Technological Applications · EGDr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INIndian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute · INIndian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation · INKhwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology · PKKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SALinyi University · CNUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen is a vital nutrient for agricultural, and a defieciency of it causes stagnate cotton growth and yield penalty. Farmers rely heavily on N over-application to boost cotton output, which can result in decreased lint yield, quality, and N use efficiency (NUE). Therefore, improving NUE in cotton is most crucial for reducing environmental nitrate pollution and increasing farm profitability. Well-defined management practices, such as the type of sources, N-rate, application time, application method, crop growth stages, and genotypes, have a notable impact on NUE. Different N formulations, such as slow and controlled released fertilizers, have been shown to improve N uptake and, NUE. Increasing N rates are said to boost cotton yield, although high rates may potentially impair the yield depending on the soil and environmental conditions. This study comprehensively reviews various factors including agronomic and environmental constraints that influence N uptake, transport, accumulation, and ultimately NUE in cotton. Furthermore, we explore several agronomic and molecular approaches to enhance efficiency for better N uptake and utilization in cotton. Finally, this objective of this review to highlight a comprehensive view on enhancement of NUE in cotton and could be useful for understanding the physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanism of N in cotton.

Indexed as

abiotic stressesclimate changecottonGhNRT1.2GhNRT2.1GhNRT2.2nitrogen use efficiencyphysiological responses GhNRT1.1

Identifiers

PMID36072312
PMCPMC9443504
OpenAlexW4292609340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.