ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2022
Impact of Point of Care Quality Improvement Training and Coaching on Quality Perceptions of Health Care Workers: Implication for Quality Policy.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The quality of infant healthcare service is one of the essential factors in preventing infant mortality. The purpose of the study was to analyze the quality performance in primary healthcare centers (PHC) and hospitals before and after the point of care quality improvement (POCQI) training for Infant Healthcare Services (IHS). Methods: This is a mixed-method study design with convergence triangulation strategy, conducted at six public PHCs and four hospitals in two districts of West Java Province, Indonesia. One hundred health care workers (HCWs) were involved for quantitative study at baseline and end of intervention. An additional 40 patients participated as informants for qualitative study. Quantitative data analysis was performed by Rasch modeling and independent Results: There were significant changes in the variables of POCQI skill (mean diff: 5.14, p=0.001), quality improvement (QI) understanding (mean diff: 1.2; p=0.001), and QI engagement (mean diff: 1.7; p=0.001) in the PHC group. Although there was an increase in process and outcome variables, the changes were not significant. There was a significant change in all variables in the hospital group which were outcome (mean diff: 2.32 (p=0.19); POCQI skill (mean diff: 2.80, p=0.001); process (mean diff: 1.48, p= 0.01); QI understanding (mean diff: 1.01; p=0.01), and QI engagement (mean diff: 1.52; p=0.03). Patient perception in the qualitative study showed that PHCs and Hospitals' services improved. Moreover, health care workers found they have a better understanding of service quality and created quality changes and improved POCQI steps. Conclusion: Implementation of POCQI in PHC and hospitals improved the performance of the quality of his, therefore assuring that POCQI is an appropriate approach and tool to be adopted in the policy for strengthening the health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.