Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072262›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Antimicrobial activity and molecular docking screening of bioactive components of

Fadi G Saqallah, Wafaa M Hamed, Wamidh H Talib, Roza Dianita, Habibah A Wahab

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Lipophilic Extracts ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Exploring the Utility ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Antibacterial Activity ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Bioactive potency of extracts fromBiomedical reports · 2025
    Article
  10. OverallFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Computational andBiomedical reports · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fadi G SaqallahDiscipline of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia.
Wafaa M HamedPharmacy Department, Al-Noor University College, 41019, Mosul, Iraq.
Wamidh H TalibFaculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, 11931, Amman, Jordan.
Roza DianitaDiscipline of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia.
Habibah A WahabDiscipline of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia.
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYAl Noor University CollegeApplied Science Private University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: The leaves and flowers of Results: The dried-refluxed samples revealed a massive deterioration in their phytochemical profiles, whereas the macerated flowers extract exhibited the highest total phenolic content and antimicrobial activity against all tested bacterial strains. However, both flowers and leaves extracts showed similar minimum inhibitory and lethal concentrations against Conclusion: Our results suggest that cold maceration of

Indexed as

Antimicrobial activityAntirrhinum majusMaceration extractionMolecular dockingReflux extractionTotal phenolic content

Identifiers

PMID36072262
PMCPMC9441312
OpenAlexW4293796708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.