ReviewCureus2022
Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Associated With the Use of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Ocular Outcomes: Metabolic Transition, Retinal Vulnerability, and Risk-Stratified Monitoring.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- Orbital MRI for diagnosing giant cell arteritis in cases of anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.RMD open · 2026Article
- GLP-1RA and the risk of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A population-based study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Lead exposure increases the risk of retinal vein occlusion: a population-based analysis and investigation of PRICKLE4/PLCXD1-mediated endothelial cell mechanisms.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer: Therapeutic Approaches and Their Complications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Electrodiagnostic tests of the visual pathway and applications in neuro-ophthalmology.Eye (London, England) · 2024Review
- Risk factors of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and central retinal artery occlusion.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- The erectile and ejaculatory implications of the surgical management of rectal cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are frequently used for erectile dysfunction (ED) as the first line of treatment. This medication was initially developed to treat muscle spasms and pulmonary hypertension. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved its usage for treating ED. Sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, and avanafil are PDE5 inhibitors. The decrease of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in smooth muscle cells caused by sildenafil causes smooth muscle relaxation and penile erection. Vasodilation of the blood vessels reduces perfusion and blood flow to the optic nerve and eye. Several incidences of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) have been recorded in sildenafil users, among other ocular complications. The onset of NAION is usually sudden and painless, and it is associated with any pattern of visual field loss. Possible symptoms include poor visual acuity, diminished color vision, a visual field defect, or hemorrhages in the form of flames. Nevertheless, NAION pathogenesis is still a mystery. Most visual effects are reversible weeks after the medication is stopped, and NAION does not seem to cause a permanent blindness. A small cup-to-disc ratio (disc at risk) and underlying systemic illnesses, such as hypertension, increase the risk of developing NAION. An early indicator of cardiovascular disease is ED. NAION diagnosis is challenging due to a lack of confirmatory diagnostic evidences. Normal visual acuity does not exclude NAION from being a possibility. In order to evaluate visual outcomes in NAION, data on both visual acuity (VA) and the full peripheral visual field are needed. Treatment with steroids did not seem to improve visual results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.