ReviewJournal of cognition2022
The Control of Event-File Management.
Review in Journal of cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of active suppression on stimulus-response binding and retrieval.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Article
- It's about location, location, location: Absolute and relative stimulus positions in action control.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Separated hands further response-response binding effects.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Computation on Demand: Action-Specific Representations of Visual Task Features Arise during Distinct Movement Phases.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Instructed speed and accuracy affect binding.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Humans do not avoid reactively implementing cognitive control.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2024Article
- Distraction by unexpected sounds: comparing response repetition and response switching.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Expanding the boundaries: investigating the integration of contextual information across a spectrum of inter-trial variability.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Imagined object files: Visual imagery produces partial repetition costs where perception does not.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Effect-less? Event-files are not terminated by distal action effects.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Predictability reduces event file retrieval.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Article
- Core Mechanisms in Action Control: Binding and Retrieval.Journal of cognition · 2023Article
- What Belongs Together Retrieves Together - The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval.Journal of cognition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the Theory of Event Coding, both perceived and self-produced events are coded by binding codes of the features of these events into event files. Here I argue that distinguishing between the actual binding process and the retrieval of event files is empirically difficult but theoretically important. As a first step towards disentangling these processes, I provide a brief overview of what the available evidence tells us with respect to the control of the binding process and the control of the retrieval process. I argue that there is not much evidence for selectivity of the binding process: Various kinds of stimuli and actions seem to be spontaneously integrated under various conditions, and there is increasing evidence that emotions, task instructions, and task context are coded into event files as well. On the other hand, there is increasing evidence for a high degree of selectivity of the retrieval process, suggesting that most if not all observations of effective impact on event files reflect an impact on retrieval, but not binding proper. I conclude by pointing out open questions and issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.