Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072107›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2022

Effects of Mindset and Dietary Restraint on Attention Bias for Food and Food Intake.

Sarah Kochs, Leonardo Pimpini, Wieske van Zoest, Anita Jansen, Anne Roefs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Food-Related Attentional Biases in Restrained Eaters: A Meta-Analysis.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah KochsDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-2352
Leonardo PimpiniDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7579-0703
Wieske van ZoestSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6760-2346
Anita JansenDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5101-8778
Anne RoefsDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-1075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence for attention bias (AB) for food in restrained eaters is inconsistent. A person's mindset related to food - that is, whether someone focuses on the hedonic or health aspects of food - might be an overlooked influence on AB for food, possibly explaining the inconsistency in the literature. Fluctuations between a hedonic versus a health mindset might be strongest in restrained eaters, who have a conflicted relationship with food. We investigated the effect of mindset and dietary restraint on AB for food and food intake. We hypothesized that AB for food, as reflected in eye-movement measures and manual response latencies, as well as food intake, would be larger in the hedonic than in the health mindset, most strongly in participants scoring high on dietary restraint. Moreover, we expected a positive correlation between AB for food and food intake, especially in the hedonic mindset. We used short video clips to induce either a health or hedonic mindset. Subsequently, participants (

Indexed as

attentional biasbogus taste testdietary restrainteye-trackingfood intakemindset

Identifiers

PMID36072107
PMCPMC9400603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.