Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072099›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2022

Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching.

Elena Benini, Iring Koch, Susanne Mayr, Christian Frings, Andrea M Philipp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Binding of response-independent task rules.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena BeniniChair of Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-8894
Iring KochChair of Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-8220
Susanne MayrChair of Psychology and Human-Machine Interaction, University of Passau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-8319
Christian FringsChair of General Psychology and Methodology, Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, Germany.
Andrea M PhilippChair of Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1290-451X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the features of a stimulus and the actions performed on it are bound together into a coherent mental representation of the episode, which is retrieved from memory upon reencountering at least one of these features. Effects of such binding and retrieval processes emerge in action control, such as in multitasking situations like task switching. In the task-switching paradigm, response-repetition benefits are observed in task repetitions, but response-repetition costs in task switches. This interaction of task repetition (vs. switch) with response repetition (vs. switch) may be explained in terms of task-response binding. In two experiments, we included a task-irrelevant contextual feature in a cued task-switching paradigm using word identification tasks. In Experiment 1, the cue modality could vary between visual and auditory; in Experiment 2, the cue language could vary between English and Spanish, while the target stimulus was always presented visually and in German. We predicted that repeating the contextual feature in the subsequent trial would retrieve the features of the previous trial, even though cue modality or cue language did not afford any response and were not associated with either task. The results showed that response repetition-benefits in task repetitions were observable when the context (i.e., the modality or the language of the cue) repeated but disappeared when the context switched from the previous trial. These results are consistent with context-specific binding and retrieval processes in task switching.

Indexed as

bindingcontextresponse-repetition effectstimulus languagestimulus modality

Identifiers

PMID36072099
PMCPMC9400634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.