Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072043›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Small number enumeration processes of deaf or hard-of-hearing students: A study using eye tracking and artificial intelligence.

Maike Schindler, Jan H Doderer, Anna L Simon, Erik Schaffernicht, Achim J Lilienthal, Karolin Schäfer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maike SchindlerDepartment of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jan H DodererDepartment of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anna L SimonDepartment of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Erik SchaffernichtSchool of Science and Technology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Achim J LilienthalSchool of Science and Technology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Karolin SchäferDepartment of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEÖrebro University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Students who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) often show significant difficulties in learning mathematics. Previous studies have reported that students who are DHH lag several years behind in their mathematical development compared to hearing students. As possible reasons, limited learning opportunities due to a lesser incidental exposure to numerical ideas, delays in language and speech development, and further idiosyncratic difficulties of students who are DHH are discussed; however, early mathematical skills and their role in mathematical difficulties of students who are DHH are not explored sufficiently. In this study, we investigate whether students who are DHH differ from hearing students in their ability to enumerate small sets (1-9)-an ability that is associated with mathematical difficulties and their emergence. Based on a study with

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencedeaf or hard-of-hearing studentseye trackingmathematical difficultiesmathematics educationsmall number enumeration

Identifiers

PMID36072043
PMCPMC9441847
OpenAlexW4292574079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.