SynthesisGenetics research2022
Association of
Synthesis in Genetics research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals Host Regulatory and Immune Networks with Inferred Dysbiosis Relevance in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- TP53 mutation is associated with improved disease control in patients with advanced RAS wild-type colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with cetuximab and pembrolizumab.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Genetic differences between primary colorectal cancer and its paired synchronous and metachronous metastases.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Immunohistochemical Analysis of the p53 Protein in Colorectal Cancer: A Clinicopathological Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- From Crypts to Cancer: A Holistic Perspective on Colorectal Carcinogenesis and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Epigenomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples by CUT&Tag.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Review
- Label-free nLC-MS/MS proteomic analysis reveals significant differences in the proteome between colorectal cancer tissues and normal colon mucosa.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Article
- Targeted splicing therapy: new strategies for colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Accumulating evidence indicates that the expression and/or variants of several genes play an essential role in the progress of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current study is a meta-analysis undertaken to estimate the prognosis and survival associated with Methods: The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Science Direct for relevant reports published between 2000 and 2020 and analyzed them to determine any relationship between the (immunohistochemically/sequencing-detected) gene expression and variants of the selected genes and the survival of CRC patients. Results: The analysis included 34,074 patients from 64 studies. To evaluate association, hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS), with a 95% confidence interval (CIs). Pooled results showed that Conclusions: The present meta-analysis indicates that overexpression or underexpression and variants of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.