Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071994›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids.

Renita Kim, Kristen Pepin, Monalisa Dmello, Nisse Clark, Mobolaji Ajao, Jon Einarsson, Sarah Cohen Rassier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renita KimDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Mt, Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
Kristen PepinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York-Presbyterian Weill, Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Monalisa DmelloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's, Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nisse ClarkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mobolaji AjaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's, Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jon EinarssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's, Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sarah Cohen RassierDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019. Results: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use. Conclusion: A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLeiomyomaMorcellationUterine MyomectomyUterine NeoplasmsFemaleHumansUnited StatesLeiomyomaMorcellationSurveyTissue extraction

Identifiers

PMID36071994
PMCPMC9385112
OpenAlexW4294860364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.