Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071991›Full record

ReviewJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Youssef Youssef, Huda Afaneh, Mostafa A Borahay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youssef YoussefDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hurley Medical Center/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint, MI.
Huda AfanehWomen's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Mostafa A BorahayDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cost and quality are important, complex, and intertwined surgical outcomes. Evidence suggests that major cost drivers include operating room time, length of stay, re-admission, surgical complications, and quality of pre-operative and operative care in general. Our practices shape both costs and quality of gynecologic surgery. Various factors are explored in this review article to present and identify ways to implement cost-effective change that also improve quality of patient care. Database: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed databases for relevant articles. Discussion: Clinical preferences and decisions, surgeon experience, trainee education, and defensive medicine can influence cost. In addition, an incongruent physician-administration relationship may impact decisions across the healthcare system. The accelerating adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, presents both an opportunity and a challenge. An example of practices that improve outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cut cost is pre-operative optimization, enhanced recovery after surgery, and the growing adoption of outpatient hysterectomy. The identification of cost-drivers and finding strategies to improve them would simultaneously improve quality and patient outcomes while reducing costs in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRoboticsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansHysterectomyCostERASHealthcareLitigationMinimally invasive surgeryQuality

Identifiers

PMID36071991
PMCPMC9385110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.