Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071990›Full record

Trial reportJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Pre-incisional Laparoscopic Preperitoneal Local Anesthetic Technique in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Abdullah Aldohayan, Sulaiman Alshammari, Ahmed Binjaloud, Fahad Bamehriz, Abdul Sattar Narejo, Mansoor Aqil, Nahlah Aldahian, Abdulaziz Aldabaeab, Abdelazeem Eldawlatly

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06488183 (Laparoscopic Preperitoneal Local Anesthetic Infiltration Versus Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06488183 narecruitingnot on this map

Laparoscopic Preperitoneal Local Anesthetic Infiltration Versus Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorsarah mohamedRan2024 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsPain ManagementArmspreperitoneal local anesthetic infiltration in group p , quadratus lamborum block in group Q
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdullah AldohayanDepartment of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sulaiman AlshammariDepartment of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed BinjaloudDepartment of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad BamehrizDepartment of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdul Sattar NarejoAnesthesia Department, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mansoor AqilAnesthesia Department, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nahlah AldahianAnesthesia Department, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AldabaeabDepartment of Surgery, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdelazeem EldawlatlyAnesthesia Department, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud Medical City · SAAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of obesity is a significant concern worldwide. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an effective and standard procedure for sustained weight loss. However, optimal pain control is essential for enhanced recovery after surgery. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to investigate the efficacy of a pre-incisional laparoscopic preperitoneal local anesthetic technique (PLPLAT) on recovery characteristics following LSG. Methods: A total of 120 obese patients scheduled to undergo LSG were randomized into the PLPLAT or placebo group (n = 60 patients in both groups). All patients received conventional intravenous or other analgesics postoperatively, as required. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score. The secondary outcomes included morphine consumption, other analgesics, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), hemodynamic changes, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), early mobilization, and length of hospital stay. Results: Pain scores in the PACU and at 12 hours after surgery in the ward were significantly lower in the PLPLAT group than in the placebo group (P < 0.05). The morphine consumption was significantly less in PLPLAT group with mean dosage of 2.95 mg (± 0.39) compared to 6.0 mg (± 0.4) in placebo group. PONV, mean arterial pressure, and PACU stay were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the PLPLAT group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Intraoperative PLPLAT provide effective postoperative pain relief for patients undergoing LSG. The findings indicated the efficacy of PLPLAT in reducing postoperative pain, enhancing recovery, and facilitating early discharge.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalLaparoscopyAnalgesicsDouble-Blind MethodGastrectomyHumansMorphine DerivativesPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalMorphine DerivativesEnhanced recovery after surgeryLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyPainPreperitoneal local anesthetic infiltration

Identifiers

PMID36071990
PMCPMC9439284
OpenAlexW4294859820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.