Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071986›Full record

ReviewClinical epidemiology2022

Differences in Classification Standards For the Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in Children. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Francisco Llorca-Colomer, María Teresa Murillo-Llorente, María Ester Legidos-García, Alma Palau-Ferré, Marcelino Pérez-Bermejo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetics of Common Obesity in Children and Adolescents.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Relationship between Obesity and Childhood Dental Caries in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco Llorca-ColomerSONEV Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4818-9546
María Teresa Murillo-LlorenteSONEV Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9905-0443
María Ester Legidos-GarcíaSONEV Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5468-4434
Alma Palau-FerréSONEV Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3660-2516
Marcelino Pérez-BermejoSONEV Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5027-4785
Universitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of childhood obesity has increased dramatically all over the world in recent years. While obesity in adults can be easily measured using the BMI calculation, determining overweight and obesity in children is more controversial. The aim was to compare the three most used international classification systems (WHO 2007, CDC 2000 and Cole-IOTF) to determine overweight and obesity in infant and adolescent populations. We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines of articles comparing any of the three classification systems. The main findings were that the WHO 2007 criteria show the highest prevalence of overweight and obesity in the child and youth population. The prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity was determined to be higher in boys than in girls in most studies, when analysing the classifications of the WHO 2007, CDC 2000 and Cole-IOTF together. However, there was a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity in girls than in boys when only the CDC 2000 and Cole-IOTF criteria were considered. Both the results of the review and the great heterogeneity found in the meta-analysis show that it is necessary to unify the criteria for the classification of childhood overweight and obesity. International standards are insufficient for working with the current population. A working group should be created to address this issue and agree on the unification of a gold standard, taking into account the geographical region, the ethnic groups and the age groups of the child and youth population and above all, the secular growth.

Indexed as

BMICDC 2000growth curveIOTFWHO 2007

Identifiers

PMID36071986
PMCPMC9444235
OpenAlexW4294991916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.