ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
Sustained effect of habitual feeding time on daily rhythm of core body temperature in mice.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential bidirectional communication between the liver and the central circadian clock in MASLD.npj metabolic health and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Circadian clocks in most peripheral tissues are entrained mainly by feeding. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the daily rhythm of core body temperature (CBT), including the effect of diet-induced thermogenesis, varies according to habitual feeding time. Methods: Wild-type and uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) knockout mice were fed only during the first 4 h (Breakfast group) or the last 4 h of the dark period (Dinner group) for 17 days. On day 18, both groups were fed twice for 2 h, at the same starting times. Locomotor activity and CBT were measured continuously during the experiment. Results: On day 18, CBT increased at the beginning of each feeding period, regardless of the group and strain. However, the CBT increase induced by the first meal decreased sharply in the Breakfast group and mildly in the Dinner group; the opposite was observed after the second meal. In UCP1 knockout, but not wild-type, mice, the total amount of CBT was significantly lower in the Dinner group than in the Breakfast group. These effects were mostly independent of the locomotor activity and food intake. Conclusion: These results reveal that the effect of habitual feeding time on the daily rhythm of CBT is sustained at least until the following day. These effects may be mediated by both UCP1-dependent and -independent mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.