Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071925›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Convection enhanced delivery of EGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates Serclutamab talirine and Depatux-M in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts.

Kendra A Porath, Michael S Regan, Jessica I Griffith, Sonia Jain, Sylwia A Stopka, Danielle M Burgenske, Katrina K Bakken, Brett L Carlson, Paul A Decker, Rachael A Vaubel and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Hypoxia Imaging as a Radiomics Signature in Tumors Using NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kendra A PorathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michael S ReganDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jessica I GriffithBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Sonia JainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sylwia A StopkaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Danielle M BurgenskeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Katrina K BakkenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Brett L CarlsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul A DeckerDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rachael A VaubelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sonja DragojevicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ann C MladekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Margaret A ConnorsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Zeng HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Lihong HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Gaspar J KitangeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Shiv K GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Thomas M FeldsienDevelopment Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Didier R LefebvreDevelopment Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Nathalie Y R AgarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeanette E Eckel-PassowDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Edward B ReillyDiscovery Oncology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
William F ElmquistBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USAbbVie (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Minnesota · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

TRD 3 - Enabling Technologies for Intraprocedural GuidanceP41EB028741 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Nobuhiko Hata, CLARE M TEMPANY · 2021 to 2026
$10.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: EGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are highly effective against EGFR-amplified tumors, but poor distribution across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits their efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) when administered systemically. We studied whether convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse ADCs into orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Methods: The efficacy of the EGFR-targeted ADCs depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) and Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T) was evaluated Results: Dose-finding studies in orthotopic GBM6 identified single infusion of 2 μg Ser-T and 60 μg Depatux-M as safe and effective associated with extended survival prolongation (>300 days and 95 days, respectively). However, with serial infusions every 21 days, four Ser-T doses controlled tumor growth but was associated with lethal toxicity approximately 7 days after the final infusion. Limiting dosing to two infusions in GBM108 provided profound median survival extension of over 200 days. In contrast, four Depatux-M CED doses were well tolerated and significantly extended survival in both GBM6 (158 days) and GBM108 (310 days). In a toxicity analysis, Ser-T resulted in a profound loss in NeuN+ cells and markedly elevated GFAP staining, while Depatux-M was associated only with modest elevation in GFAP staining. Conclusion: CED of Depatux-M is well tolerated and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, CED of Ser-T was associated with a much narrower therapeutic window.

Indexed as

antibody-drug conjugateconvection-enhanced deliveryDepatux-MglioblastomaSerclutamab talirine

Identifiers

PMID36071925
PMCPMC9446689
OpenAlexW4293173685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.